Gangadhar vs Prasanna Jagannatha Shetty on 26 November, 2009

COIfiCILI&'.';;[_QR' ORQER
The ieazned counsel for the appellant amt the ieaJ:*ne<_:1___eo111;1sel
for respondent - Insurance Company along with as represexéietfire are

present.

After prolonged zxegotiations, the matrteri-5:’se1;tie_§i”. ‘§it:eVkapipeviiantj’

has agreed to receive and the respo:1den’t: e liiesiivrafitre’
agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs. ofiifi
in addition to what has been awa.1’ded A amt”! Ii-nai
settlemeet of the claim. A j0i11t’ Ivile.1£1e of the paemes

to this effect.

3. The respendezii has agreed to deposit the
said amount, the 2iia’fe of preparation of Award,
failing which the~_eeii4’_c1 interest at 90/6 from the date

of default, 231:1 the ci’e:ea of de;_)d$s–i1::.”~.–

4, x”1″i;:«-is’ efieeeilaneeus ‘appeal stands disposed of in terms of

the Je’iI1:fc of the Tribtmal shall stand mediiieci.

:}ie’eerdi:1g1§f. firaae Aware’ aecerdingiy.

Sd/~
Judge

sdf.