IN THE HIGH eoum' OF KARNA'I'AKA AT BANGALQRE
DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF AI-'REL 2009f;
BEFORE _ e
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.S_.'PATiL '
WRIT PETITION No.674o,1«2oo9(qM¢?a
BETWEEN :
Gangadhara, .
S/e.KuppasWaH1}?, '
Agfid 57 Y€~aT5z~, -_ .
Residing at Nc).}JZ}i9-'8, _ "
1*-'*2 Cross,
Bangalore-.56{) Q21; ' ._ ...PE'I'I'£'IONER
(ey Sfi;S;'Sh.a!ker'She£ty, Adv.)
AND: % L
Sa1nt}adhamVA;,-. V' V'
'V " / "
3, Aged abogt years,
No, 1363;, .11: Mam. Road,
F'rak3_.sh'néiga1"~,, ' ' '
Bangalore -4' 5160 O2 1. ...RESPONDENT
‘_ ._ “‘:’Z’1″1is writ petition is flied under Articles 226 read
._j_.with 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to
quash the order dated 18.10.2008 passed by the I Add}.
” “City Civil Judge at Bangalore ill}
” » C3.S.N0.2877/ 1988{CCH–2) as per Almexuxe ‘F’ on the
applicatien under Section 151 read with Section 15} ef
Code of Civil ?mcedu.re, and permit the petitioner herein
-3-
to amend the schedule by incorporating 11th ‘A’
Road instead of 12th A Main Road according law. T ”
This writ petition coming on for
hearing, this day, the Court made the f(}110WiI1g7.’4._ .
ORDER ” e dd
Application filed by _ tI1e»:t__
amendment of the §ud$nem:
the correct cieecription progoerty is
rejected by the belo-“$.33 order.
The Court the plaém: is amez1ded,__ of the decree Cammt §
2. I f«1evedehee1″d.”‘£}1eiIeeii1ed counsel appearing for
_. _the peijdfioner the materials on record. I
ebsoiutely no illegality or error of
tf1eV..order passed by the Court below. As
right1j}?’e}J§§eri7esd by the Court below, unless the plaint is
e {he gudgment and decree C31’}jI”i0’£ be amended
Almeorporate the description of the suit schedule
. V _ u” as sought by the petitioner.
3. In these circumstances, writ
fismissed A T
However, it is open to the_ pctitioriéf’ ” u
necessary application tr) seek (Sf.
in accordance with law.
Judge
SP8