Gangadharan Pillai vs Additional District Magistrate on 25 September, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22361 of 2008(K)


1. GANGADHARAN PILLAI, EZHAVARETH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL

3. RUGMINI AMMA, THANNIKKAL KIZHAKKETHIL,

4. JANAKI AMMA, THANNIKKAL, KIZHAKKEMURI,

5. SOMAKURUP, THANNIKKAL HOUSE,

6. SARASWATHI AMMA, THANNIKKAL HOUSE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR (CHERTHALA)

                For Respondent  :SRI.  K.SHAJ

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :25/09/2008

 O R D E R
                                  K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                           WP.(C) No.22361 of 2008
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                    Dated this the 25th day of September, 2008

                                     JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges Ext.P4. It is an order passed under

Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner has no objection if the line is drawn as permitted

under Ext.P4. The line can be drawn only as permitted under Ext.P4.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has no objection in the

line being drawn as permitted under Ext.P4, I see no reason to entertain this

writ petition. I dismiss the writ petition. But I make it clear that the line

must necessarily be drawn as permitted under Ext.P4.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sb