High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Gaurishankar Thakur @ Gauri … vs State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Gaurishankar Thakur @ Gauri … vs State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Cr.Misc. No.18268 of 2010
  GAURISHANKAR THAKUR @ GAURI SHANKAR JHA @ DINKAR JEE,
                   S/o Late Kameshwar Jha.
                            Versus
                     THE STATE OF BIHAR
                           -----------

02. 23.06.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is

permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer

portion of the petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35

of the Arms Act, Section 17 of C.L.A. Act and Section

5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

The petitioner was refused bail by order

dated 07.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 43395 of 2009

with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing

of charge. The charge has been framed on

23.04.2010.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional

Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Motihari in connection with
2

S.Tr. No. 166 of 2010 arising out of Patahi P.S. Case

No. 85 of 2005 subject to the following conditions:- (i)

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor

will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any

change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in

the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if

he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-