$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 3564/2011
% Judgment delivered on:3rd November, 2011
GAUTAM KUMAR VERMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Anuj Kumar Garg, Adv.
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondent
Through : Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers
may be allowed to see the judgment? NO
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest? NO
SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)
Crl. M.C. 3564/2011
1. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that vide FIR no.
334 dated 10.10.2011, a case Under Section 365 Indian
Crl.M.C. 3564/2011 Page 1 of 3
Penal Code, 1860 has been registered against the petitioner
on the complaint respondent no. 2 at PS-Nazafgarh. .
2. Further submits that the said FIR has been registered
on the complaint of the brother of the girl namely Prakash.
3. Further submits that the Petitioner got married on
07.10.2011 at Arya Samaj Vedic Marriage Mandal, 2115,
Jamuna Bazar, Delhi. The certificate of the same is Annexed
herewith as Annexure P-4.
4. Further submits that the petitioner never abducted the
sister of respondent no. 2. Therefore, present FIR may be
quashed.
5 Learned APP for State fairly conceded that since the
marriage between the petitioner and respondent No. 3 has
been taken place and both of them are major, in the interest
of justice instant FIR may be quashed.
6 Respondent No. 3, who is personally present in the
court states that she has married the petitioner on his own
sweet will without any pressure or coercion and is residing
happily with him. She further submits that she has no
objection if the present FIR is quashed.
Crl.M.C. 3564/2011 Page 2 of 3
7 In the circumstances, I quash the FIR No. 334/2011,
Under Section 365 IPC, P.S. Najafgarh and all the
proceedings emanating therefrom.
8 CRL. M.C. 3564/2011 is allowed and disposed of
accordingly.
SURESH KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2011
j
Crl.M.C. 3564/2011 Page 3 of 3
Crl.M.C. 3564/2011 Page 4 of 3