IN THE HIGH court: 05 KARNATAKA AT sanegioéé DATED THIS 'ms 15*" DAY 09 scream, BEFQRE THE HCWBLE MR. JL3STICEV)3S:HQK 3}' H1INQAH::G'E§§i" ca; pevmoas Na.4ee.k33%QF%A2oca + BETWEEN GEEJIGANDA MILAN P0o£asAcHA"" ~ g slog LATE PAPANmA@M?¥J 2 " AGED mom 2:. vE;m-3 ~ AGRICULTURIST V RJAT GARVALE \!Ii.L.;'¥G'E SOMWARPET TALL::<T_'t; _ --. MADIKERI o1::s*mIc7.'=T_-- v " my %%sRIV'R1K; M»ifiAnEv, ABVOCATE) Arm rats. sTmi:m2 H<i;usE«:2FF:cER soMwA%apETJ%pe;1cE% STATION SOMWARPET, so*e.s3m.;2.=~ET TALUK " »-.._§;4ADIKERIV :::zsT;z:'<:T_, (BY SR1 HONNAPPA, HCG?) PETITIONER RESPONDENT
* IS FILED U/$32439 CR*P.C BY Tiff A.DVO(3kTE FOR
“om: PRAYING ‘mm THIS HON’8LE caua? MAY BE
‘PLEASEEE to ENLARGE we Permotsten on BAIL IN CR.NO.29;’08 or
SQMWi§R33*ET P.S,, MADIKERI DIST, WHICH IS REGISTERED FGR. THE
‘VOEFENCE P/’U/’S.3l’32 Rgw 34 or IPC AN3 $EC.25 or xwamn ARMS
=ac”r.
This petitien naming en fer orders hearing tfiis
Court made the feliowing:
D_B..D_E.B
The respcndent registered Nd’;2?3 ” L’
Kashi @ Geejiganda Kushaiappa vAMa.:{;:i’v.._ti:e’ petiti«ei}e;r.3for the
crffence punishebie under Section .ii\§:*;hV Section 34 ef
the inéian Penal Codeend Settiégi iihezffiiidian Arms Act,
1959.
2. brief is that the two
accuseci pere”cneV..i:::§e Papanne on ism March,
2808. The petifi”cine”r .fii’edA’«ti&i’ci:applications for bait. Beth are
rejected Seesie§ie;’:’£c-mrt by its arcéer, dated 9″‘ July, 2008
anei ‘
3.; AS_;s*iéR.vi'(..’v’i”#§ei:iadev, the learned counsel appearing far the
. ..V§_Ai:«et§i:£.9ner su~hin:Ete that the getitioner is the son of the deceased,
‘._¥_’v-fee’he’i1A.Vrie”~i.ntent§en whetseever to kill his father ner there was
‘V«7ein.yV”.pre§yecatien fer the same, At the most what is attracted is
‘eizfisection 324 end {mt Section 302 of the Indian Pena! Code.
else submits that the deceased himseif was a rewdy-sheeter.
533!