High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Geeta Singhwal vs Union Of India And Others on 10 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Geeta Singhwal vs Union Of India And Others on 10 November, 2009
CWP No.12306 of 2009
                                                                  -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                    CWP No.12306 of 2009
                                    Date of decision : 10-11-2009


Geeta Singhwal

                                                .... Petitioner

                                 VERSUS

Union of India and Others

                                                ....Respondents


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA


Present:    Mr. Jagbir Singh Malik, Advocate,
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor General of India,
            with Ms. K.K. Kahlon, Advocate.


KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral)

Sh. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor General of India

appearing for Union of India has stated that he himself is concerned

as counsels representing the Union of India are not paid their bills in

time.

Sh. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor General of India

state that to ensure quality of assistant to the court, it is necessary

that all concerned advocates should be paid the amount subject to

the verification of the bills.

Counsel for the petitioner submit that qua bills which were

raised in year 2003, payment has not been made by Union of India.

Sh. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor General of India
CWP No.12306 of 2009
-2-

assure this court that payment of all bills raised till December 2007

shall be made within three months from today.

Assurance given by Sh. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor

General of India is accepted to the effect that those advocates who

have submitted their bills till 2007 shall be paid the amount of fee and

otherwise decision shall be taken on the bills, whether concerned

Advocate is entitled to payment or not.

Writ petition is disposed of in view of statement made by

learned Assistant Solicitor General of India.

As prayed, liberty is granted to all concerned advocates to

pursue their remedy under Contempts of Court Act, in case

assurance made by learned Assistant Solicitor General is not

adhered to by the concerned department of Union of India in the right

earnest.




                                 (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA)
10-11-2009                                JUDGE
manju