High Court Karnataka High Court

Geetha W/O Late B N Chikegowda vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 30 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Geetha W/O Late B N Chikegowda vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 30 July, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa
passed by the Ciaims Trébunai is iiabie ta be 

making appropriate erzhancemems Lmder   

H8363.

5. Per contra, iesrned éoufisei forf::£At3rp{)r::afiefi','=.L

inter aiia, ccmtenéed and subS§é'r2ti$t$d"t}fifiiJf%1éV.':i§r;;$ugned
judgment and award  'f'viv*'§Hb1VjJr1ai is just
and pmper and Afiaes r*g;t_¢ aVii'  

8.   appeitarrts and
iearneci   Corporation arid after
carefwa finfigifiai recxjrds avaiiabie an fiie

imiudirsfi  award passed by the Ciaims

 Trit:-x;ij2uaiL;~t?1e ti'n%--)?:§7;_;_5:§§stion that arise for 913:' r3i3fiSid$¥'3tiO¥'I

 , Wféfher the cczmpenfitian awarded by
 fh'éaC£.§:'ms Tribunaf jg just' and pmper ?

'   ' i°t is undisputed that, the deceased Wm working as

V[  "T'kafiic Ccrziroifer at Niangaiesre Qepet of tha responders?



Rs_1'¥,1?',8Q8J- and the same is roamed qff to
Rs.~:1,17,9as:-_ Accordingiy, a sum of Rs.11,1?_';9g{j9 _§'$

awarded towards $6559. of depenciency

7'. The Ciaims Tribunai   5% V'

R$.5,0fl0I-- 'rewards funerai expefsséag' Sific;=e'~the 

appears to he inadequate,  ._it'vV.a:§";;:2V§*t:. ;'f2}*i'?.a'tVe to 'V

enhance the same ._ 

8. The Ciaims   ts.) awarci any
ammzrfi affeniiorg Er: respect ef
'3ppeii:émts;  pointed out by faarned

ceufisei f€>s<_4a pvpc=,;¥i3jiii*$." Vifiaving regarci to the reiafianship

  sf  3:36 é.e§'i§s...:;:.,==,riween the deceased and appeiiants

2 {a5n-:3;"3;'%1%f:%2:::¢§nsé6er it appropriate to award a sum of

 to appeiiarats 2 and 3 which tstaliy games

'*-.39 i?s."E.{§,'{':O«Gi- tawards was of have arufi affectican.

V'  92. in $5 far as the amaunt awards,-é by the Ciaims

   _,v_T§*ibur2a% tcawarcis icnss of fitate and tom of censsartium is

/



 case"; ..aé.:s'.tfi'feé abave, the sppeaf fiieé by ayapeiianis is

% kJ[jai%;§wed 3:: part.

cancerne-iii, the same is just anfi proper and 
forirzterference.  V'  H

10. in View of the  
deem it fit ft} efihance the"  
Rs.6,25,0§Of- to Rs.11,57,9{§i3%;'?v'at§d  is as
foilows  _     
1.

Tcawards iossnf ‘E ,1 73001-

2. Rs. 1Ci,G{)0i-

3. ” V Rs. 10,080}-

4. Téfitarés Rs. 10,606!-

S. Towaréis_¢.ibséVfif affeciition Rs. 10 0001-

Totai A? R§.11,5?,9OG£-

‘fight of the fads anti cimumsmncm 9% the

The impugned judgment and award

passed by the Ciaims Tribune! dated 5″‘ my

13.

immediately after the deposit is made by A’

Cerporaiion.

Draw up the award’ agcdrziiagijf. ”