IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
OP.No. 29627 of 2000(B)
1. GIRIJA SASIDHARAN
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE MANAGER
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.M.A.ASIF
For Respondent :SRI.SATHISH NINAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
Dated :31/10/2008
O R D E R
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
O.P.No.29627 of 2000
==================
Dated this the 31st day of October, 2008
J U D G M E N T
For amounts due to the 1st respondent from the petitioner,
in a loan transaction, the petitioner’s property was brought to
sale and Ext.P1 notice of sale was issued. This is under challenge
in this original petition. The counsel for the 1st respondent points
out that pursuant to Ext.P1 sale notice, sale had been conducted
on 11.10.2000 ie., after the sale. The petitioner has filed this writ
petition only on 19.10.2000. The sale has become complete and
final, and the additional 4th respondent has purchased the same.
The petitioner has not chosen to challenge the sale itself. Now it
is submitted before me that even the additional 4th respondent
has sold the property to somebodyelse. No stay was also
obtained by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, no relief
can be granted to the petitioner in this original petition and
accordingly, the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
2
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
===============
O.P.No.29627 of 2000-B
===============
J U D G M E N T
31st October, 2008
3