Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Girija vs State Of Kerala on 29 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7510 of 2009()


1. GIRIJA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.V.SREEJITH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :29/01/2010

 O R D E R
                         K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                       ---------------------------
                       B.A. No. 7510 of 2009
                   ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 29th day of January, 2010

                              O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.1 in

Crime No.463/2009 of Palode Police Station.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The second accused is the husband of the first accused.

He is working abroad. The prosecution case is that promising job

to the de facto complainant at Dubai Airport, a sum of Rs.

1,15,000/- was received by the accused persons. The amount was

paid to the first accused on behalf of accused No.2 as well. Though

visa was arranged and the de facto complainant went abroad, he

did not get the job which was offered, and therefore, he came back

to India. The de facto complainant filed a complaint before the

Court of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-1, Nedumangad,

which was forwarded to the police for investigation under Section

156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Crime was

accordingly registered.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

B.A. No. 7510 of 2009 2

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

her on bail on her executing bond for Rs. 15,000/- with two

solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

A) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and when
required;

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.147 seconds.