Girimallappa S/O Maleppanavar vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 3 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Girimallappa S/O Maleppanavar vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 3 June, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH coum* 0% K/mwnmcn AT BANGALORE
omen was me 3*" my 0? JUNE zoos
BEFCNRE:

THE HON'8LE MRJUSTICE MOHAN 

 * 3 gain. '4 =:..': W -  e....I:+  5

msmaz

GIR1MALLAPEA4 ' _ I -9 _._.x ,

sxo MALEPPANAVRRH '1 i v' "VA*-=-m.

AGED R300? 59 ygaRs~"_= « C.
0CC;AGRlCULTuRE' ' "'

R/O HARAVI VILLAGE

TALUKwHRRAGRL "_ .b= ~"

DISTRIC? HAVER1,'g --,V=__ _; ... PETITIONER

(By 31:: *SURE.$H' Aj£e.HuDgé'mc;Ann1, ADVOCATE. )

BEE»?
-2' STATE 0? Knamarnxn
REP_BY ITS SECRETARY
».*Eo REVENUE DEPARTMENT
T'M:s.su1;n1nG
' BANGALQRE~01

'§ ?fiE*5hPuTy COMISSIONER
~~ 3-IAVERI

AA;3, THE TAHSILHAR
' -- HANAGL
DISTRICT HAVERI

4 THE I-{ARNATAKA VIKAS
GRAMEENA BANK
135! ETS MANAGER
NRREGAL, HRNAGAL TALUK,



DIST:HA'VERI. . . . " 

{ By Sri R.KUMAR, GE' FOR R'~l T0 R'-*3  
AND SRI A.VE'.NKJi'I'ACHALA.IAH, ADVOCATE   

This writ petition is filed undigr  5:22? 15:'; the "
Constitution of India praying to quash the "order" ,

passed by R3 vide Anna-.xureC.  _

This writ petition coming for   in 'B'
group this day, the Court made  : ' 9

    L
The o1tic1f '-:>__f    dated
20.9.2037    forfieifing the
lands  77/3, situated at Haravi

village      

2%. 1411.:   that the petitioner herein had

 '~    loan in the 4*" respondent-Bank. The

unpaid. Hence, the 4*” respondent

fiéfiovcr the aniount under the pmviaions of the

Credit Opcmtions Gs Miaoelhneous

x V’ ‘T L’ Act, 1974. The 4*” ncspondcnt filed an appkcafion

* Deputy Commissioner for recovery of the arrears of

” {lie sums due to it by the petitioner towanls financial

A. assifianec given to the petitioner. The Deputy Commsaianer

V5

-3-

by his order dated 8.2.2907 issued a recovery

older of the Deputy Comnulasioner *

questioned and the same has bccoipe ‘II; ‘.
certificate, the petitioner did _z:1<_".§t

Deputy Commissioner the
sums as ordered by as: The
Tahsikiar is stated to haéu-; ;+u¢;,,3,;~ Form No.37 on

3.3.2007 to the pefigionggi; théitvtpgtitidntér has not paid' any

amount. the the aiozenlcntimleti
lands the State. Hence, this writ
pefitianivis order of the Tahsikiar dated
20th

3. ggaontendea on behalfof the petitioner that the
family mcmbexs are enfimly dependent on

th£’tAJ’u!3LlV1(i.?f.~ lands an-, forfeited tn the State, the cntim

to the stxeet. In Pma~8 ofthc mcmonmdnm of

petition. the petitioner has pleaded that if some

time is granted for repayment ca’ 10311, he

‘ “-«ivttjistaticxtakes to n-spay the ban amount.

I/V/S

-4;

The writ petition :3 Opposed by Sri

learned counsel appearing on behalf of 4″‘ _

inter alia. contending that the

leniency as he has failed to bf
Opportunities’ _ ” ‘ _ ”

4. The Commissioner
dimming the petitione;f.1£9. p§ay has become final.

The As the petitioner
has not ‘ V oxtle-red by the Deputy
taken action in aoomdancae
with ~ be said to be erroneous or

ufljiifififiefl’ –

having regard to the submission made on

this Court is inclined to grant some

tc{fi1ast4:””pe1:it1Toner to repay the amounts. , the

is an agrictlltuxist. The sowing season is just begun.
” yvheiexm, this Court is of the opinion that intzrest of justice

be met ifthc petitioner is granted eight months time to pay

the entire amounts due as mtiered by the Deputy

If/S

– 5 –

Commissioner either in inst:-zllmcnm or in iumwum. Hence,
the following order is made : ‘ ‘
The petitioner is granted eight months

pay the arream of the amounts due him

Bank either in instaammags “:g ;g clear
that if the petitiomar as ouicmd by
this Court Tahsildar to
take action __1’n to the order at
order gracntcd by this

& Sd/’F
Judge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *