Govindaiah S/O Late Thimmiah vs The Addl Deputy Commissioner on 9 March, 2010

 

I

'fliiifl}flIHi(HD(fl?TCE'KlEfllflfl?flU\AJ7EUUIIALCEHB

nxrnn mrsmn am my OPMARCH 2Q1f(--'I :A' h

IBEFCHE

warrmrrrr1ormo.722a  % 1 %  

an-nut:
aovxuna-mu-I V.
sxo Lam -nmnmm   . , .
AGED amour 61 was  _     
R/A1' no.2, aonmamn   v 

AND

1'!-ll Anna-~ nxeui-v .cc'h-txésxounn

mu DfE3'%'l'Il:IC°TV__!l?uGiIi"P£!.!;1"£ uunsn
 mncrxm '0? urmrmoazssn

DCCU?AflT§3_6!"£U£--LIC PRDIISIS ACT, 1974
much; B:,a=r31c:=,VV_..~

. . . RESPONDENT

an-:L4:z¢.’1s’.. vrsmr.-mm, mm

fmxs vnrr rs-rrrxoa Is um: unnsa ARTICLE

” ‘j22§._.mtu 227 or nu: norm-1:-m-non or man mum:

PENDING DIBPOBAL 0!’ THE APPEAL IN’ HIICJPPEAL

‘V§..”A”~m::.5/10 anon: ‘PHI 11 A1301… 13151′. 5 sssszons
JUDGE, I-Neon: 1’0 STAY FURTHER Pnocssnmss

9!!-I VNVLVNEVX :10 .l.3flOD HQII-I Inmwmuuuu .. …—

.;. .. W’ v-ewu1Ia”VOil’I1\fl’% -nwrll MWWKI ur AAKNAIAKA H§GH CflUR’f QF !(.ARNfi¢T.M(fi WGH COURT QF KARNATAKQ HIGH COUI7:

2

?URSUAH’P ‘PO AN}!–A Ifffl 5.2.10 INCLUDIRG BEVY GE’
PERM: REIT TO THE TIME OF R3.1,}.5,900/*- S: DIRECT

THE RE5P€3l’£flflf’!’ HG’? TO Thfi ANY FURTHER

DISPOSAL OF ?HE ABGVE APPEAL.

-rz-as rxwrrxcm 15 counts on FOR 2m:n:%sga~:%% %[

3-IEARIHG mm mm’, was coax? MADE was ‘

Learned counsel

pemmma of the “court to wt pisciuon

2. is dismissed as

/; %%%%% sd/1.

}7jDG

V *m§a;}§£3.%%

§ v$W”i% mmmw tmmmz mmwmmmgm swmzaw wmw ~ M