Gujarat High Court High Court

Gujarat vs Arvindbhai on 20 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Gujarat vs Arvindbhai on 20 October, 2010
Author: D.H.Waghela,&Nbsp;Honble Smt. Kumari,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/15395/2006	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15395 of 2006
 

 


 

 
=========================================


 

GUJARAT
ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORP.LTD. - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

ARVINDBHAI
RANCHHODBHAI PATEL - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
PREMAL R JOSHI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR NILESH A PANDYA for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HON'BLE
			SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI
		
	

 

Date
: 20/10/2010 

 

 
 
 


 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)

In
spite of the previous order dated 29.09.2010, learned counsel, Mr.
Joshi, has not placed on record a properly prepared paper-book of the
entire evidence laid before the trial court and relied upon a set of
papers supplied by the respondent which is admittedly not complete.
After carrying on an academic discussion of the legal issues, learned
counsel could not answer any of the factual queries on the basis of
the evidence which was required to be referred in his own interest.
Therefore, it was clear that instead of extending any assistance to
the Court and producing any papers as proposed earlier, the
opportunity was taken only to waste considerable public time of the
Court. Apparently, in view of the clear observation in the previous
order that no further adjournment may be granted, learned counsel did
not directly request for an adjournment and sought to argue as
aforesaid. Prima facie, the
litigation appears to have been carried on in collusion right from
the outset.

Under
the above circumstances, the hearing is adjourned to 29.12.2010.

[D.H.WAGHELA,
J.]

[SMT.

ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.]

JYOTI

   

Top