Gujarat High Court High Court

Gujarat vs Noormohmad on 19 June, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Gujarat vs Noormohmad on 19 June, 2008
Bench: H.K.Rathod
  
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 

SCA/27578/2007	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 27578 of 2007
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

GUJARAT
STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

NOORMOHMAD
OSMAN - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
HS MUNSHAW for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR ASIT M MEHTA for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 19/06/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned advocate Mr. HS Munshaw on behalf of petitioner, learned
advocate Mr. AM Mehta appearing for respondent.

This
Court has issued Rule on 28/1/2007 and granted ad interim relief in
terms of para 8(C).

Learned
advocate Mr. Mehta has objected about confirmation of interim
relief. He submitted that he has not received copy of petition with
all annexures. No doubt, notice was served through office, but
apart from that, being unnecessary dispute whether it was liability
of office or advocate, it is better that learned advocate Mr.
Munshaw will supply copy of petition with all annexure to the
Registry of this Court and learned advocate Mr. Mehta appearing for
respondent will collect said papers from the Registry of this Court.

Learned
advocate Mr. Mehta submitted that because of this petition, the
workman is in tension and suffering from high blood pressure. He is
working as Driver in petitioner Corporation.

In
light of this back ground, it is directed to petitioner Corporation
to place on record the calculation, which has been accrued in favour
of respondent, if award is fully implemented by the petitioner
Corporation on the next date of hearing.

It
is open for respondent, before next date of hearing, if he desire to
file any affidavit in reply he may file it, otherwise, matter will
hear by this Court in absence of affidavit in reply.

Considering
the request made by learned advocate Mr. Mehta, matter is adjourned
on 27/6/2008.

(H.K.RATHOD,
J)

asma