High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurmukh Singh & Others vs The State Of Punjab & Another on 11 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Gurmukh Singh & Others vs The State Of Punjab & Another on 11 February, 2009
 CRM No. M-33689 of 2009                         1




    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &
              HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.


                                CRM No. M-33689 of 2009 (O&M)
                                Date of decision: 11.2.2009

Gurmukh Singh & others                               ...Petitioners

                                Versus

The State of Punjab & another                        ...Respondents


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:    Mr. SPS Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners.
            Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.1.
            Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Rajan Gupta, J.

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482

Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.304 dated 16th September, 2002, under

Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police

Station Sadar, Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent

proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise/affidavit

(Annexure P-2).

The complainant and petitioner No.4 are stated to be real

brothers while petitioners No.1 to 3 are stated to be cousin brothers of

the complainant. Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in Court. He

is duly identified by his counsel. He has filed an affidavit, which is

taken on record as Mark ‘A’, admitting therein the factum of compromise

arrived at between the parties. He states that he has no objection if the
CRM No. M-33689 of 2009 2

present FIR is quashed.

The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the

matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is

likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which

would be a futile exercise.

In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent

proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of Full

Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of

Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
February 11, 2009
‘rajpal’