High Court Karnataka High Court

H C Venkateshappa vs Shri M Nagappa on 25 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
H C Venkateshappa vs Shri M Nagappa on 25 September, 2008
Author: B.S.Patil
nun: \a\l\ll\l ya nnnnunsnnrt Iniwel uvunu vi Iu1l\I'I.l-u.wu\.MA ruurnz uvunl Ur mmnawninnn ruun LUUKI Ell' RHKNHIHRH HHJH UUUKI

$83"! VI I\l"II\I'l"1Ir"}I\l"I II

1353 um HESH mun: or KARNAIAKA AT sA1zcw;Q1§.E
warm "ms THE 25?" my 133?  L7  

3 man:  

'gm HQWELE MR 3UsTI€3E3§¢$.p}ss'm'%i%%%   - %

wax? ?E'1mmz N{'3.13§.i?"~{)F   
gazxaima;    

H.c.x»'mmeshagm,   %@

35$ C    V
agcfiafism SS    V    ' 
_' %   
'Mmdi I-§ab;:§h_?_?   3  ~  
Kala"    ' PETITIONER
{E39 ;§m?.§.§E%'.?'  

      2   ..... 
S59 iii-E'?-*'::: -. .r_  '.  ~.
ageé. a§&:$£;t's$3 ywg '

 zmp;

    % 
" ~  aggé-awn: 38_yn':m,_ 

 §¢%s1dms.:f};::mhwm

 Nmdi Habli,
 Tahak,
Kala  M RESPONDENTS

{By Vaemfia Kama’ Sivwfi zkfivecate)

fliifllfllk

% gmgg wgficaiom we rejected by the txial cm

. .,……i _,.._,I: ………H.n…. .1…” Wu.” vr nnnnnlnlsn 21:61-I COURT 0:: KARNATAKA HIGH comm’ or rcAnNAm<A HIGH com'

g:-2!!

'Writ Petifinn is fileé mule! Aazticlw 226
the Ca: n sf Infia will a. player in call for

Q S}§'é"'§. 13§;s2fiM an the file at' the Primépal Civil
& 3, flfhiakhallmux, pangs the 3311:: '

patitian.

gm was Pctitinm mmzg %

fiizmtmsie fi1ef::Bow1’11g:-

Pfiiiéemz is the second below. He

ma :2: in ad mm ” ax Civil

mas?

2,1 «dam % I.A.I~IOgi1mhng’ pmm ‘am

kéaftzu: dcfmm mac- I-A.No.12wm

:3. mm :11; Tshsildar for being

re cafl far mm nmeiy, heme list

an khmeahumazi 219.113 fivavm his custody.

3., “§’§§2m7a1£3eur£hmrcjectwflm@p1ismiarnmkin.gm

gumn1m:ihsTahfiwmdtepreamczthcdacmnnrfi.ref¢rraite

%/

.-was uvunn vu Iwnnawntnnn niurri \n\J7aJKl Ur HHKNHIHRR HIV” UUUKI OF KARNATAKA

new abmre mm mm the new us: mm

fiscrmwrt, £1.-be ncrtifiafi asap}: mum be my
mam Ezfiara aha cam. “rm cam has a1scs & ‘
fast tZisa= ammems sought for by %
zecméu Hence,

am he agmm. Th: Com mu’ gf egpfimm
fig ‘%’..«emxé commds that
of the ctifiual house
§75tzE&%:aie§”%§.a,};é as the WUPW3 twang’ 333.110

:3§1::1%.§;f:11’m in the ham fiat axtmd am in thc

the name :31′ Nagappa son of
pinfiflerespondsnt herein is zecottdsd,
the *mcmcency’ mm tvm docnmwntts, it was

‘ 3’V§§¢A:%§”a.fj; he szzmnzmn the Tah%..

having the 1mm Coma} far the yams mm on

eazffiépmnasieffimmsmiaisonmcariidonfifinéaay

§fi B:fi%fifiE €fi. {fit is the ewe Qfthe dfidmtfllai

,%

…… ………… ,….,’.: .m.m-manna nnan uuulu ur NAKNAIAIEA HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COUQE

tie Ixnzymy £22 fispute is 3 G fits,

écammits am ahawtha itwfi in fiat a
may rzsffim mm fifth: p1aS:aw-Naga§pa__in K
axmct was flfiegal, mule! have hm

‘Ea§asilda:r is net 3 warms: is Eevikfifiptéfi in % . % %

mm, the wh’;a::’eu;¢ saw nghfly’

5. jg p to re-

aye}: 2 . f enable lén tn aédnce his
fwflm man from the records tha the

_§§§w’tii§§§’ gag ggss am pm: by inampcmng at
mm daazmmxm er mg am in the: am

m additianal mus has hm mad. The

1% his mm evidmce an the addifional ime. 1:

V :»§§§:te§as;az§ tiaafi the demdmz shafi also be fivm m
:9 W his mum cviflmzaa, in resgcct cf the
A Iiefiénzmgag mm mg. The cm: Maw 1139 posted mg mam

fmm*gmam3wfi3mpmu7&gm@m tcthn
Mam’ Hmrimmgmémthe add:i1ictr3.a1imuefimned,i;tis

J6

…. wwu… .._._.. ….-nu-n-n.u–u. sum” wwtvni vs uuanmnu-auu–n uuwu wvunn v…u”n.nnNnM-1.nn. niwn uuumi U!’ mflfiflfliflfifl HIUH LUUKS

jmfi ma’? Eflfifly {ha the defeném aim must be

Crg§CE!£’§”LLfii§§” Es Isaac! fizztha caridw wfih Wad to

yameé rajaetfiag ihe applicatiim in__.:hi.s’ ‘ 2

sustaiymé. §ienac§Epwsthefe11erwi::g:;”1«. ”

ii} Wa%’..?an”d.a12§s djsp9’wd_s3fi’.’:~. A

ififi ‘Eh: mama

fin: 1

§1e:;m?:a evidenace is

m to 1% fulfils:

vm fmnecl.

the: mncaim mm far
% Tahmm {er pmmm af the

find.-zsmaa,

Sd/-

Judge