H Gopala Bhat vs H Vijaya Bhat S/O H Beema Bhat on 9 September, 2010

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AN. VENLTG-OuPA.LA::G.Q'WDA'a"~--.x

IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEP'I'EMBERx2.:(h§"1Q

BEFORE

WRIT PETITION NO. 7349/2010  

BETWEEN :

1

HGOPALA BHAT  
S/O H NARAYANA_BHA'1""' -.  
AGED ABOUT 75..y1é:AR--s , . f ~  
R/O KELAGINA PERADE.1,,U:HQUsE  .
ILANTI-IILAV V1LLAQg'AND__PQs*r~, ; ---- 
BELTHANGADY '1"ALUiAIvALIKE,"IéAn/AI,IjKE POST

V  UPPALA.'--  .
I,  KASARAGQD TALUK AND DIST.
  

I _  _H'~1\IAYANA..
  ,I)'/Q-II THIRUMALESHWARA BHAT
_ ' MINORAREP. BY I»-IER FA'I'HER/
 GUARDIAN I-1 THIRUMALESHWARA

BHAT, SHIVAKRUPA, NAGARA
PAIVALIKE, PAIVALIKE POST

W«_Iv1A: UPPALA
 KASARAGOD TALUK AND DIST.

KERALA STATE.



6 KUM. SOWMY A

13/0 H THIRUMALESHWARA BHAT
MINOR, REP. BY HER FATHER/
GUARDIAN H THIRUMALESHWARA
Bi"-IAT, SHIVAKRUPA, NAGARA
PAIVALIKE, PAIVALIKE POST

VIA: UPPALA _
KASARAGOD TALUK AND DIST.
KERALA STATE.

7 H LAXMI W/O A SADASHIVA BEAT?  '
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS ' 
R/O ANEKALLU HOUSE  _
KAROPADY VILLAGE     
ANEKALLU POST, BANTWAL TALUK--- '_ A ' '

8 1-1 SHANKARI W/O H NARASIMHABHAT
AGED ABOUT 58 yE'ARS~ _ L   A. 
R/O KAIRAE'-IGALJX VILL.A_GEj;--__ .
BAN1wALf_rALUK,U,K'  _ 

9  BEEMA BI'-£A'E'_  .
S/O LATER-.NARA3{A§\IA BHAT
AGED ABQUT'56'YEA.RS
R/CJ1_)OQR'NCJ.A \2'¢1"5E)55/B
_ASHA'N1LAYA  
 NEAR POLICE QUARTERS, PUTFUR
 EUTFUR TALUK, D.K

  1'0:  A.  'S;/O H GOPALA BHAT

5"' {13V"SMT. VEENA K, ADV. FOR R8

 ._  AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
R/O' i;.ELA<31NA PERADELU HOUSE
- ILANTHILA VILLAGE AND POST
BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.
  RESPONDENTS

  SR1 K RAVISHANKAR, ADV. FOR R1 & 2}



THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
22'? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.02.2010 ON I.A.NO.Vp'"8--,pIN OS
NO. 71/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE~~(SR.DNJ &
ADDL. CJM PUTTUR, D.K. VIDE ANX--A, 

PE'i'I'1'ION, To THE EXTENT OF REJECTION Q15' PRAIi7ER._t Q1;

PETITIONERS.

This Writ Petition coming on for pi*elii'1iinVaI3rVV hearing  

in 'B' group, this day, the Court  t:he'iifol1r).\'épvi1"1'

P1aintiffs/ respondent  and  herein: instituted
suit for P'Iu*tition of  properties. The
petitioners who::'a,re  10 in the suit
filed  plaintiffs' claim.

Issues heuze' trial has commenced and the
plaintiffs have 'closed  side of evidence. At that stage,

defendant  and 10 i.e., petitioners herein, fiied

ILEI;A:,INo.'SE?pseeI{ing permission of the Court to produce five

  plaintiffs filed counter and resisted the

prayer  the application. Upon consideration, the trial

 has allowed I.A.No.8 in part and has permitted the

--  petitioners to produce three documents i.e.. Item Nos.3 to

/7

A



5 and has rejected the prayer in respect of {tern Nos. 1
and 2. Aggrievecl, defendant Nos. 8 and 10 have

writ petition.

2. Sri A. Keshava Bhat», Iearneci'.Co'n'nseV1f~for.:,the 

petitioners submitted tha.f.;_'v"t1f.1e  
I.A.No.8 in part only has  act. He
submits that, the  '4(.'1'(V)V,:L"".iiLI11€_2VI1'[S which are
necessary forpconsideration  of the Iis
have not  ..,._t'Q.,,--' Vprotiuced on a hyper
      .  V
 i'  1 and 2 though are
repre_sventet'..., theelear~neLiu"iicounse1 has remained absent.

A " ~   lloihave perused the writ papers.

2  "tilt is true that, the written statement filed by

 I X1'thekpetitioners herein does not make any specific

/'

rt



reference to the documents mentioned at S1.Nos._.l and 2

in I.A.No.8. Since the documents were  be

produced after the closure of_ the plai1fitiffsfT:'V'&of

evidence and since the plaintiffs«..'are  tfsuffewrf 

prejudice. the trial Court is ifinf'disa1.ltaW§fhgfifthe

production of the said docurnerrts.

6. Since the  produced are
stated to be   for decision in the
matter,  the prayer in I.A.No.8 is
allowed,' relevancy and proof
of the the condition that, after the

defelédantsl"ei)idence'- completed, plaintiffs shall have

 of'. leadingfrehuttai evidence with regard to the

  produced under I.A.No.8.

if  :."Vfollo\r2'ing: 'EX,

 In the said View of the matter, I pass the

_



ORDER

i} The writ petition is allowed.

ii) The impugned order stands C}ua5:h\€C1~.: ”

iii] l.A.No.8 stands allowed;–.’De-_ieodé1r1’tsVV:are held?’

entitled to produce

I.A.No.8, tlieg made
supra. A. l A ‘

iv] After the’ VA evidence is

the right of

eliiiderice with regard to the

prtoduyced along with I.A.No.8.

No costs. it

r . S6/E
_____