1
IN $33 HIGH C08RT OF Kaansmaxa am BAsasLékfi'_
DATED TEIS was 1"'nAx er AnGUsw{3%§§§C' " '
was fiON'BLE am. Jusrxég a5£;'fiAfiéfifi§&Ef._*;
Vfifig . _ ,. L.
TKE HON'BLE MKS. Ju§f§§E_$.§;"fi§fi3RA@Hxa
aw
-L
BETWEEN:
K . 2- . Eian1;rna:3.jt}ié;x'§2dci3f %&si,<¢. -- "
Th1ppa1ah,,6S year3;}A' fir 3
Rfat n.Ha,4eég, r:sa1e*§pta;
Did RT¢*QfEmce€Raad4' 'W
MECi$lQck;"3*_Cxo£$§W
18"' Maia , ' Kuvéizgunagmi ,,
aavanagere.' "< *.'*" APEELLANT
'gay Advgcate smm.K.Ha;1na for
' * sxi;s,$.vgnxata Reédy}
3. sfo
Z 'Eyed Ismaiil, major,
'~-..§E;'o_v't.221, rI.R.squa.re, Indian
Mutual Buiiding, fiuhmnpet Rcaci,
Bangalorewz.
By its Branch Managax, .. RESPQ!~$'IJEH"iFS
3
(Advocate Sx.:i..K.Sureah for R-2} _ __
(R--1 . . Notice dispensaci with}
mm M.F.A. is filed u;;g1e;+:T%%sa¢;%;«:3;;;
Act against the judgnent; and award datéd V3'1..'.'».2002
passed 3.32 mm 949,193 on "2:1:£.---~._£'.s.1é.-v- of. the t;':;£*;:*-:i...}.W»3!2t:14;,¢a
{Sr.Dn.) Se Adm. fififif, Iv£axsi'm.,1gir1;-._§:arV'tly.» allowing
the claim petxtion for c<51"§pC-.'-£'1}3a'f';,i.3;.':-'.|I1_ and seeking
enhancemezat ef c4a:rg:ge2s,sa.?ti'rJii'.'A
This Appeal is ' ;'on_ ";Evi:.;' --adm1.ssi-an this
day, z~:.m;-*».n_n..=:.z*:n«¥..na. J. c!a_J,,i.'ta*e,~::*-$9121..Vt1z'=;=é'vVf:.%l.};r.$~:-11:29:
-I %¢n%.<;i~:§_r:§
= :.'-,aW listed for adrnissicn,
with tiia z:oV:t:xse;x'::t'.i_Lj~.«v,$f'-._ E;mzi21$e.1. on best}; sides, it is
izaarci finaimy. . _
T1i£,:s faigpeal is filed by the 1n3u:ed---c::.1.a.:.rnanT 1;
1*:é.~.'§..::g' A »§ii..s"-5%;-t.is£1ed with the judgment and award
pa§.*--_a _ed :e:o.949/3.993 dated 31.55.2392 by mew,
" - ' 4. _ _' ' -;Madhu§j9i.;fi. .
_' ' '££'}ze relevant facts of the case axa that on
" *15.6.1993 at about 3 a..m. clainmsst was traveiling
in a bug bearing No.I€1~'z. G§---«l088 from Ifiavanagere to
fix,»
3
Bangalore as a gassenger when it was." 'éprotteééing
rscear Seebi forest at dashed againait'
bearing 1~:o.MH 25-7379 wh1c:h.:wL.a*..pa.5rI:e;¢V;i'Ars:Vé:; "the. 'mast.
of the read and as a res11.7£.i'i:.¢ ~
claimant suffered Vwarr
shifted to Govexnmgnt at.' and from
there referrad t<:¥ Bangalore for
finrthex treatment. atated that he
has spent 2_'::é$:;é§ , 9:66;}-" treatment.
'1'hereforéau ¢g;_aV"1"m petition see3<:::.'ng
<:ca:<@eé1:sa_t.i.¢5:iv."_...V¢}§r:t head.s.. Before the
tribuné.2._," "i;n "rJesjg:ect of 1" respondent-the
dx.1′.*;e.*x_ of ut21£’=:’ ‘0f.fé’:”‘1d..’i..I1§’ vehicle was ciisznissad while
-A $3″ 3″? resfiéééents were p.3.a.c;:en :
~~1.”;. Whether the clajznant has pxeved that the
accident which occurred on 3.5.6.1993 at
about 3 31.11:. on ma-4 near See}:-.1. Forest was
due ta the rash and negligent drivgng of
the bus bearing I~I.KA 04–1088 by its
drxvex?
2. Whether the claizrant sustained injurxes in
the accident and he is ent:i.tJ.ec1 for
fis-
4
campéasation and if so, ta what amfifint and
fra wha? v» V x
3. To what Order?
in support of his case, claimant» gm£<La1ngéi£ "
examaned as yw–1 and one Dx§A.¥W$;S£géxanfih"a3aEE%2 =
and got marked E5.9–1 to 338:_ The txi§fig$1;;$££§z
nothing that he had suffékéfi'ml£ifi@é fr$;t;re5 anfi
taking into cansidéxatiéfiflfifié-étgfienéfi"5% ?W–2 the
dactcr, granted cam§é$§#ti§h_§f §$f1,6G,GOGf~ with
intexest at as p.a; fpém tfié agté bf claim petitian
till thé"é#te $£'£eai;za£i6fi. Not being satisfied
with %hé_sazd<fiudg@m£,and awaxa the claimant has
preferre§%#h£$ apfifiéi seeking enhancement.
4._§ WE. ha§e»H§ea:d the iearned counsel for the
V a§§éli#@: -?hd the counsel £9; zmd respondant
“;n5uiandg ¢mpany and perused the evidence on
record;’. ¥
2*xS(*_ Tie only peint that axiges for cur
hcohkidaratian is as to whether the campensation
u””#waxaed.by the tribunai requires to be enhanaed?
&
5}
6. on perusal of the pleadings and “.2-…«1:
is noteé that the appellant had _§1i£§ereer,1993 and
the nature of his injuries there was
§hf.$a;bi1ity. However, tribunal has not
these aspects and has granted a meagre
coanpengéetion. It 3.3 further seen that the
apjfiézllant has pxocimceci 32.5.9-22o to 338 which are
grescxiptiuns and bills and 3.31.?”-4 S. 5 which are
in-patient bills and other doculnents in order to
prove the nzeaiical expenses which have been incurred
3/”-
‘7
7. The aypeal is allowed in the afore,-3a:L el _téz:hi3.&.
ml .-.’.
Sd/-»
Judge
V’ ” ximaaaa