High Court Karnataka High Court

H J Ramesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
H J Ramesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 November, 2008
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit
 

IR 293 HIEH couaw or KARNATAKA Am aAnGALnR$} f 

paras 'I31-IIS am 1?" my 02' Novsmaa  

PRESENT _m~,_ E :u' ~
THE Hns'5LE nm.P.n.nIHAxARAfi; ca1fir afisfi:;gf tf
KN" _% 1 _  _
THE HN'ELE um.qnsrI¢3 §§G;.sA#HAsir_3
WRIT APPEAL R$,13aiJgdhS §xmn

---av-an---any

1 H J RAMESH,°V" > =,,

AGED  '-£2'5:_,.YR£i_,f V '  

axe H}§;JA3APPfi} '»j* """
PROF:VI&A%&LAKfiflMI,HOTOR[SERVICE,
CGLLEGES 4B.{):I;D;~.1«i:.1.t£§»I'.'t'CiP.'3,

 's:V;v:a;=;;:y;a5.:'r5..-511 213.
'-._~9443~_4.sf:§$5

3  3&9 z*c$mA.c1-IA
AGE? AH-06'!' 40 YEARS,
 sis 3.x. 'F1-£A24E~EIPJ-E,
'"'~.14TI-I BLOCK,
* .fHADI§(ERI, KODA33U-571 201.

N 3 PBEQEP

AGED hB€'.U'l" 58 YEARS,

SXO LATE SHIVA R33.
SHIVAPRNKASH I-{('}'I'0'£l SEEVICE,
V'IFtAJE'E:'2T--573. 218.

wuomrwvmre wxn mnnavnnmsuu unwrap Msmwmfg,  mmmuwmnmnm rrmww mwmna VP!" mnmmmw-w\H HIWW finuuau W? flflfiflfliflfifl NEWW BUUKE K)?' flfiflflmflfifififl HEW" QWMM

   



«usw-av

 

 

...wwg_A 3. nnmvnnmmm mun 'u¢Gu:J'J¥'.I ur zsnnmmmam Hiiéfl €.;€.:?UR"§' Q? mmmmm %"§!€?E~% CORR? O? KARMAWFAKA HIGH CQUW

5 C D MADAPPA
AGED ABOUT :4 mans,
sic: c.x.:mvnIm£,
£4!/'S. DIYYAVAHI 24I0'£'{}R SERVICE,
caxrxaeenx,
KODPs.G'L¥-5'?3. 213.

{By sx-i wrwrea R RA!-EE5.}~£  ad1};.}_  A

AN!) : V

1 THE STATE 05' I-.'.§RHAT.=_*-.K.A_    ,
BY ITS PRINCE PAL' 5E<:3E§1'§.a':n{_   _
1-unseen? DE:E*.h.Et'£'24E1H_'!',. '   
14.3. E»UIL{:-H593,   --  V 
na.a.a.,a.'««.Vge:Aa;_  
BANGAJ_-€:RE--%{5_$_i3 ~*3:E'1.= _V

2 -ms amazrnggn *r'aaN's£-114N,
.  av rvrs mumrxr; nrnmc-rose,
" 'CMML os'Frt:Es,
!§.H.fiOflD,

%    T.s;;~;;;aLo.a5;es6o 927 .

4   A afijanlssn
 K.§J0fl;
§'A'E_HER'S Nuts: HGT mwmm 'PG wwrromas,

..  we oamwm
"-._JAGA{sE' ESTATE,

  emaxca, xomm:-571 219.

   MALIAHDA erwcnsx
wxaoa,
E'A'Z'HER'3 NAME.' RG1' KROWN T0 PETITIGNERS.
naawmoxnu sum,
G0§iIKOPPA £€0O.?sGU-~5?} 213.



--~' w--v-A-_.  -w-mu-unwfi awn"? wvum ur AHHIVRQMNR Wausm K..UUi(¥ Ur ¥£ARNflaTAKA HIGH COEJRT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT

 

13

14

15

15

BUS 0? 5R8."i'0R,
NALKERIGHAHA,
i€GDN3U-*5'?3. 2213 .

9 U vcamsx _
MAJOR, : '

EATHER'S anus Nam Known T9 9$?r%Iém£a§;"f=u'*~

EUS OPE1fiA'I'0R,VIRAJE'E.'Y,
KORFLGU-571 313. ' '

2 A eamaxva
FATfiER'3 REES'NOWaKNURN_T0,PETETIOMERS,
BUS oezaawoa, =» % 2 3:  *;a,-.
vxanaaaw, *._ f
xnnasu-572,z1s,""=»;

B aAsaanH£wa;9a5aHu
MAJDR, ,"V" .} *§a"=., =_~
FA'?!-{EEi.TS'---  EDT  TC? EETITIGNERS,
Bus aesaawoa; ',' "~~
fl3"VERY'&h¥¢UT;,'aW

KU3Hfib'HAGfiR:'a.*, ,
Ko&AGBe511_234,"a *"

.3 D 9R&§AB~'

.;uA3oa, °--_M _

 'E'.'%'?HE8'$ HARE: NOT KHOWN To PEPITIONERS,
3Us,ae£aA?ca,

" fk¥ififi3FET»
*, Kfla&aU«§?z 213.

1?

"V x 3'?$LaHGA9pA

anspa,
s&wHsa's RRHE new KNOVN TD aswxwxoxmas,

i'*.sMa opsaawon,
'-.£KbNhNJEGERI,

K€§'DAGU--573 234.
. - . RESFONDENTS

(By Sri B.VEERAPPA - GOVERPIKEW A9'n'O('.'.A'I'EJ

VRIT PLP?E?sL FILED U/3 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH {2GUR'T AC'? PRRYING TO SET ESISE THE ORDER



 

wvvnn we ww-umnuammrmu-1. mseww wmmwmg, wr nnnxvmannn l|"E§'&'l'¥'! mwwlu 'Mr nnnnumflmu HSWH MVUKI V? RMKNAEHIVR Niki" UMMKI 5.)?" @5.flKNAVl3'\KA HIQW QJUURV

953839 IN THE war? PETITION xo.19oex2ou5'~V.§::;;{mn

:s;?;2oas. Tm % @

THIS wan' APPEAL mourns up Em 'é-:§:sL::41x:Lr:.'§a?f_ 
mum; on -mxs um-, gnaumxxfxg ;_z., '.n's:1;:v§,asnV'-{rug 

FOLLOWING:

This apaal in £1254 fl? tfif §hti;ioners
in W.B.RG.1906/03 fi#ifi§ 4§§r%§§§§ by the order
dated 13.?  the learned
Singla Jafiéfi ha &i%fiig¥éfi the wmit petitiun
rese1:fvi§,9~.   pat it ianars to
queatiQfi th§w¥§§¢l@t£§fi cf the Read Tzanapozt

Authpxit§wp&s§a& fin 4.2.2098 and patitionara

 fiés-3:;  three weeks time to file

 € rfi#isi§fi;°fi§tition undax Seation so or the

rte-1_: éx Yf9'ii.i_aéias Act, 1968 am has ebsarvad that

'r_tha R§%i§ing afithazity uhall net insist on the

A 5]'p.¢i'nt of limitation.

2. The appellants filed W.P.R0.1906f08
saaking fax a writ at prohibitian at any other

appxqpxiate writ at arder ax directian ta

M)

 
 



new»:

a
F
3
.

.t
“a
g
r
s
3
.

2?

3

F
3
9
;

issued. to the reapcmdents and it was
carciered that any proceedings taken 031%
5.2.2903 shall he sub-jact t;3A»V.tho,§»£

the writ petition. During the

writ petition, RTA-thu_ “~fiecdncg
passad the resclutign ggaz;i;’ing–._»LAatuge-:..¢£!.:§.riaga
pemits to the subject:

nmuhezts in the
mrit pet:l.f:*i§€:~:; the leaxtneci
Single ” 15.1.2903 held
that survives for

:mr:aic1eratui4<5nv"r§§sérving lihearty tn the

j…s-writ.»4fgufiitioii&'r3v______i;Ar; question the reaclutiona

»::{f–»_;:}::§_'«R§fi51"-vpassad on 4.2.2608, if aggrieved,

wuwavwnmg .-was aw-nmsua-mmnxuw-a wxnwua wwwnz mu" mnmnwmannm mum'; uvuni wr zxnmmnw-am-1 WMWT"! MWUKJ W? %.»MNN?fi%E.ME'%.:F\ Nib" Kpflfiwfi

writ petition. Thereafter, the
posted to: being spoken 12:: cm
and as mama was mrzaved by the learneci
tfiénuiijael ff:-If the petitimners mead the learned

Eingle Judge after hearing the counsel for the

petitioners held that there was no need ta

mmdify the cu:-dar dated 16.7.2008. Further, in

\.x''

«nu-wt»

Wm..'T' mmmmw "W" "WWI W mmmsam rmwm mmm m» mmmmm mm: czmm W mmmmm mam com'

the light of the interim ardax granted ifi tn;

writ patition, the 'getitionszs 'we;§= §§§fifié& *
three weeks timk ta file, ravisiéfif §a€ifi§on 2
under: Sectican so of the

if the revision is s6 ii;edQ it figfi 6zdéred*

that the respandanta –Rgvi$ing_Afitho;itf shall
nat insist on the §0ia¢ §ffiifii§&$ion.

Baigg agéfiigvfig by thévaaifi orders of the
laarnpd Sinéié Judfifi; tfiig appeal is filed by

the writ–pati#i§n9£a}*"

.-i$g* We “h#y§_.heard the learned ceunzel

‘§@§aaximg far the appellants aha the learned
HG¢§a:fim#§t § Advocate appearing far the

raéfiqfifighés.

‘ 4. Tha learned counsel for the appellants

‘ :m§uhitted that during the pandancy at the writ

petition, permits have been granted vide

resolution dated 4.2.2003 and as per the

K?’

“””*~W”” “-‘T “~”*M””W=*”~M *”*WW %«UM%I H»{r wmlvflmnm Human LUUKE us- maaxmmmmm mmzm tmwuzu aw ammmnmnw Mmm uwum ur m.mnwM§M.mM mm:-a uwuwu

learued singla Juflge in the impugned under anfi ! ;
the grant of pazmdtm to the aplicanta d§¥§§®fufl”x
4.2.2008 pa$sad.by ths so¢and ragpon@nnfim§fi@;iV:=

be auhject to the order that w5fil&:b§é§@§§§$: z'”‘

in the ravisian tiled under fiégtiafi Q0 bf Ehe-H5

Kata: Vfihicles Act.

‘ ‘ : ‘ Justice

u., fl ; .~:.Jtui€nB

X13

In$§x5;?eafR§” f