H K Prasanna Kumar @ Prasanna Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka By … on 27 July, 2009

R5? Vi Me 'wk 529' t~°'~Z '.3

%3!£"' !%€'<2g§=*'*3,l?¢L¥;"<&:W.§§'*}§$''i  i*"'&u$5%.¥'€.E¥W£""'&Ei¢'*'§i¢%'k:§% WHWW 5ma%

... PETITIONERS
(BY SR1 31.3 DKSHPAHIIE, BIN.)

AND:

1 THE STA'?! OF KKRNATAICR
BY THIRTI-IRHRLLI POLICE

(BY SR1 !fOHflAP?.\, HCGP3

ms cm:..r rrunn u/s.¢"éL2 ° cn.p a::'«_"'TsV? 
ABVOCATE FOR THE 1=s-r1'z=Ig>Na1::~""%%I=si3%:'im#  ms
I-ION'3LE comer my 3: r:.fi;-.{s51::"--%_f1'f=¥.;'>'i.  oanxn
rm 2.1.2eu9 rasssn av  -x»Liz».¢iéC»,%r:3oun-r-1:,
samosa IN s.c.Nf3;"3§*/2696:  "  % 

THIS ps1f;TI<3£---   éafinns ms mm,
m: coum Zénsstnh-In 
P¢f:i-t:5_.on£;t°3, '  Qbught for quashing the
I- }:::V.b£§a; ' p.§ss"ed t!:§"Wi5¥'3Vaat 'Mack c:ou::t.--II. shimga

iii  '.'  ' aa§:'.. :§6}2§ t)§ .

2}  counsal for tha patitionnrs

"~":i'Vi,"¢A§;'*n#$ ::n*.itLt_ad"inst,1-than the matter was pasted for
  the prosecution has filed an
 V §p9.1icaticn under section 31}. at Cr.P.C. to
-::V§c:a13. tha witnusses £0: further examination, the

" said app-licaticn was allawad. Further, he submits

that after racalling the witnesses, evidence was

I

. . . \32:e.£=*:$n1é3n%i:::s;'%r   4%    7

Q



$~§¥€;%'zW 809.3%"? G? mamafmm 

 

,w-W.Wmmmm.m :a'w'z;:¢x%"$é 3-\§,,ww%"a" {W %%.W%m."E"M{% WQH $333.??? 0? %AKW%."E"&éi~*:1aIIé-:=i3?=

recardcd and new the case is set  tor

retarding the statement 3.5/5. 313 

3. After: perusal of the  

is scan that pctitianars  t§~..__ i

the said applicatiory sif1c§ '-..thc  tti.£::1ahsé:s 'h§v;
alromy bun examine?!  fi2Q{_:T2%.g' Econ s at
down :01: recoxmlglnq  "91;§tefi:h§£s't""  u/s. 313
C1:-.P.C. .. there = to interfere
with the 

 Psf;4i'¢I;i'tV'}3§"¢:t: I-Iwcvex-, the learned

' sagtfiibna  difiikitod to difipéfid at the

mat1;*':e;r_'  as .§a;:§'J.j(°vé§"-Vgavsaibla, but not latar than
time V'rae3nt!zVs:V'v.1'.i'ms!:"~~--1$ha data or rm.-aipt of a copy

   ..... 

sal-
Judge

, H521