H K Ramesh vs The Member Secretary on 18 December, 2009

KN TIE} HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE

 

DATED THIS THE 18?" DAY OF DECEMBER. 2ooIO_9LO'II.O_

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE  _ Q O'

WRIT ?E'I'I'I"ION NO. 29723 OE 2:169  

BETWEEN

s/O. LATE REVANA SIDDLARPA 

AGE 39 YEARS  ..  

R/AT DOOR NO.820/30, 13TH-I-CRc;>vss'   
VQYANAGAR, DAvE1\IOERE."'» --  *   'PEITTIONER

(BY SR1. R  .1  

AND:

-._.__..._........

THE MEMBER SECRETALRY - ... _
CCC 8: MANAGING ~D'IRECT<)R_\
DAVANO-ERE DCC'VEEN'II:_ LTD'.
N031}, A ELOCKV ._  

D DEVARAJARAS B " AVANE

 - .1? B  D_AVAN'G~ER,E-577006  RESPONDENT

 (BY  E: A/S, ADvs.)"

 FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 3: 227
OE T_HEV_v'CO§$iSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT

 ' QTIIE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER HIS APPLICATION FOR
 Tijil"; APPOINTMENT OF SDA EILED BY THE PETITIONER
..jfvIDEI.;INN--A; AND ETC.

O HOFHIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRLHEARING IN

   _iI3'5 GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

J%+~V*~\

%°é"'iE



F.)

ORDER

Concededly, the petitioner is ineiigible jfbif

and secure appointment to the vaeazrit.,§;i0st::jef”_

pursuant to the paper notifieatilen tats

he is over aged. In that vie’W_v”‘of thee

mandamus can be issued iéis_v’;prs.yee1’~.ffi’otr; Petition is
accordingly, rejeeted.A-.._._”‘j–

KS