High Court Karnataka High Court

H P Kantharaj S/O H.S.Puttannaiah vs The Deputy Commissioner on 24 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
H P Kantharaj S/O H.S.Puttannaiah vs The Deputy Commissioner on 24 March, 2008
Author: K.L.Manjunath
IN -run axon ooum or xcmmtram 

ma-an mus was 24th rm: or Aém§é%*  

.....':.'rxo1~: ::9_.'3sec er? 29:25

BETWEEN :

1

2

HPKARTHARAJ

Minn nun!!! LI:
l'IFnIdIHl-F CIZVVIFI T'? I

R/O mmmu %' " V'

VIII?

ao::'i._:v.* ,, am" *§iLi.'f;E'nim£.i5"' "-rug"--x

nnssmz ms-mICT{-5» 'mama am nomnn
U. s.mm,:1}a/2;_ ,} s/0 sunmm,
S.AKA.LISI£:¥.JR'»TfiiJ,aUIi_, .aa..ssm nxsnuc-r.

 E». mo :1 P zmrraanaau
Aann%;a.neu-1-i%4u% Yams,

; 12:9 HEBBASALE VIIJ.-AGE,

Q H0312!--,«' aucamsnnm. TALUK

c.-

 1

H2-.5-mm nznmzcw.-. 9.39. 3! mm 239;. sewn

, n-I1: nu-can
V.-.8

 MA as amazes, s/o summn,
%,-V'-v vim.»-9:, Brsmron-a Efihini

E

PITITIONRRS

000

 my $21: 1: naaavnzmmv. )

0

THE DEPUTY C-'OEBESBIONIR
HASSAN DISTRICT,

Ill HEX"
lll'$|IIuIl"I-V I

THE 1'JE'PU"T."¥' Ct'Ji.~'l'5""'\'l'J'\'Tl'i"< 'F
HASSAN DISTRICT,
HASBAN.



3 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS 8s'lCIR3'1'1oRY,
DED_h_1l.'!£!l.'1' Q!' RLIVEHIJE,
M.8.BUI1'..DIHG,

VIUHHNA \7iinu""HI ,uaNua.uL.u<.I.i J. .

(By 83:1 :M.B.  

man: A warm or cznwxoaaax nu
wficnsfififi fiT . 19 . 2 . 2:306  ,(fi:i~_m'riE:fE L. t  , TWO
rnouamm AND mar-m vznja  1-o '1-an
pm:-rxou mm opnuon D'.l1'.29 .,1.'2m'J.8,_ (mutiny NINETH,

-'.i."'nii patitiisfm "    
hearing this; 'day. 'i'-hei  " the iallawing:

In thiatlt  claiming to

be the  6f» _'tIie  n.?Lauva1:L land. made an

.£¢..'1'""9."' 1' '5"

w---- -- -wy- wvqn

   he nnnu 4;

__._ _....J

 on the ground. that there is an

"  ..  to the coffee plantation. The

Ciciiaervator of Foreat has requested

the
   V  from the Dqauty Conlninaicner of the
V V has

 d;l.,gtr; t.  Daputy Q9zI.!n:_Lg:_n;c;:z;_;' __.._



'Is-o e 2.=.-.-.-..-.-*.. 'N' H'-

V  ftnnnnae.-I-1.;
-nu-n-u-v cur' gale? 

Q; £55311; 11.3.5 HI 1

4s

C-"n§efv'a*'r of Forest. The 

ground. that their applioation  

considered in aooordanoe    "

before this court   cfiuaeh
the endorsement ironed ~:_t_:'he  fiozaservator

If #15::
1

'~'-T1'

if

c'maiii"er_=-and   to issue a
writ of _    respondents to

oonuider the gppiicgrion fiiled by them on merits

as the Karnataka Land Revenue

. __ _”« 4|_.___

ow siioh apjaiioatione are

Conservator of Forest. Following

the’ in other oases, this writ

‘y”v Petition is allowed on the following direotions:

“limnexure–A which is the endorsement/opinicm
.._give;n by the Deputy conservator of Forests, in
quashed and the Deputy Gonuniasioner is -directed to

. .’.’.w..”.*.:’,’ G….”’..-:’-…’!..: *-‘-‘-” ‘” “*-

reoonsider the matter and give his opinions to the

Tree officer in aooordanoe with law in the light-
of above principles and T311168!’ ~

In La’. –.n. J .-

avaivlaiau a..un-ca than ufiau LI

4

reservation of any in gnvonr or’

either by any General

express order at about the xi”
settlement or by a speoizfiizr

time of grant, has to give: asgiegipiniioh

title to the trees vest,’ in thetowner’/’oooI:pVV hag

‘é lane.

D’
1!.’-.

3

E
E :2
E
1%
El
*3
R

— ——v~~–r– —- ~—vv– ” .–“-.r 3. v -« —-‘

felling permieaion petitioner by
noiainsx such. tit: by following
the

t_.’—q–w –…._

‘3} mm .1.im.u-1-.-3; +.-=.-.- obtain
opinion Department and/or the
Revenue it ogizinioni Deputy Gonxniesioner or
the giant. as the case may he, tor

‘~ deoinionn on the applications oi

ietontpe§tiumne=a’;ii

shall be within four months from the

_ ofreoeipt of this order. If there is any
_ fieleay in passing such order: or it the trees are
X _ ‘ out, it is open to the petitioner: to seek
it to out and transport than pending

by the “1.”‘ree- officer by depositing

” —1-M oi’ *-‘- t.-‘:e.-as 3- may I:-.e dete’*”*”‘–‘ by the

$13 hllll E’

concerned D;r.coneervator of Foreetolrree o,£;E.i_er9

such deposit shall be subject to the final order
of the Tree o£:EioerlDy.conae::-vator oi! Forests. It

8/

5

.1′.

1.; ..i…….

is decided in favuur of the _ by
granting permission, the amount
refunded. ‘ V’ ” ‘

agcuagg to $4,? ma; ii!’ u;t1m-+.~.1~,r

e} 1~!ei.:1n.iz~.-,’.r .-:4.:.=.=.!:e.-.J.. a..h.e..-e 13.5

acceptance of the -.ii.=.i’Ii_n;- %

to the respectives or the
trees in_ reapeotzjat has
sought. The mat:ter?. w’i’1i=’V be decided on