High Court Karnataka High Court

H R Nataraj vs Theresiyamma on 22 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
H R Nataraj vs Theresiyamma on 22 January, 2010
Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda

_EoU”a*r’bE i&X§}§A7Am HIGH coun

…-….~ – -awn \..uu:u ur IKAKNATAKA G-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

_ &A&«&kkEar1gabr&-2-

A ‘ ‘(Eff s:i.L.sree1mnta Race, Adv my R2, R1 say

IN TEE HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT

mama ms Tim mm! mm! or f

PRESEHT

TI-IE Honmz m..mmaa,g’?am

A1mT% %
Tm HOIVBLE MR. JxJs’I1cE%%}jia;v%sI«2gEz§Ivp;ssE

H-Rfiataraiaic Rangéaéwda.
Muthige poet, ‘

(By sm:.:a,%R,shar;a.3amAy Adv;

A W x.L,.Jam Kuciu;

Hs..Q57{ Raflway caoktny,

V _ B%1-as-24.

L 3, Tm ;

‘I’kme~lI:zi1:ed India Insurance Co, Ltd..,

x pm Box Ems; 3, Imian Mutual Buaam,
” .I’Ia:.*ass?mhm_;’a Cimle,

%3%§DER’TS

‘Has ms IS zrrmn 21/3 1?3{:; <3? MV ACT'
AGAEI33? 'rim JLmG1o.m~a"r Arm AWARE) mmm
mam PASSED m MVC No.93/99 {OLD HG.?'31%)
SH Tim FEE Q? '£'1+$ PRL.C£VE JUBGE €$K.§H} &

x

— —- 3. …w.§……..m» men coum or KARNAYAKA more COURI or KARNATAKA HIGH coiigr or? x£§i§}§?A’KA’ r%§’I<é§:: couii'

AddI.MACT, Hfififikfl, PARTLY ALLGWIRG

pmrrxon FOR comsnaxrron & A%%'%%s§E;:ma%«

EHHANCEMENT' OF CCMPENSATIOR.

'r:-as APPEAL comm ormog ;?iE'Al§EHC§: & x k
DAY, N.I{.PA'I'IL. 4., DELIVERED:"fIE_ * ;

fie ofthe prLc:ynJu¢g¢'(%sg.9jn.%;% Hassan
' fin» brevity]. The
tr1'bunaJ.. has awarded a
sum at 6% p.a. under
di the szlaim of the saw: far

raawrnziants. Being fined,
meessitahed. is preaem flfia appeal on

the smut}: awarded by the tribunal ?m

and ha in mtitkad fiat mt of

5

2,T%1abrfifa:c’ml&¥fi’£:3t1m:::asearetl’mtt11e

3 u salsa’ ta-amllant was atzzéfiym’ IT! acurse and in

addition m that, M was aka chafing :

That an

. ‘,3 ._ _.. .,..n…. ….m \…u-uicl ur mmmnm a-nan count or KARNATAKA rjlcsa count or KARNATAKA HIGH com

2’2:10.€38, the claimazxt was mrxying potamw

bearing rmxuawn Na.KA-13-51 19 in
purpose of seflixg them. At: __aho_1;t if)” ”
atoppad the: ksrzy on tm lefVt_:_ aai;’i¢

out the repair. The was
standirg with a I that trim, at
Canmzr w% from
Haam age mum and
also the zany. as 3.

rwult sustained grkmus
irajuries Cihannarayapatna hospital

at Bangalnre.

cI.a%%t–appellant mad a claim

akfi the rmpondezrts c£a.i2:ung’ mmpenaafian

The said alaim pefiticn had mama up

. ‘4 nibuml far mmidwafinn am afbw wéul
sf am am} and dammmmy avidezim and
% [beam relemz; mmsaz an mm, has mam the <:Iai1n

wfitien in mrt and awarded cempmsaficn as atateeti

/3//«

5

augzfig

6. m tribunal further mired in

mad.m’ uataa ccznpmmatinn towards Maxim:

feed, murhlmt and ‘.jfo 1″‘: K ” ‘V

rcwaon that the appellant Md :1f

9. period of em xmnth and %
and that he might havg_e apeggFj%
com-eyazm, nouri~shi.rfi;” _ ” ckmrgw.
‘I’here£ore, it is 3 sum (sf
RSIISIQOOI’ ~ .

VR§V;:”2,000/- p.m. It is the ezsasa czf the

_ he was arming Ra.2,5GG/~ pan.
£8; *3 just am zmsonabke as m-« assesa tbs;-.

,.wV_.’ nntuvt-HAIEA mcm count or KARNATAKA men COURT or: KARNATAKA man COURT or KARNATAKA mew coax’

of the claimant at Rs.2,50G,i— pfim. He was aged

.-V

: . ai;’bi*uja1xt 21 years at the fime of aecidmt and tbs: proper
applimblewill be 3.8 as pm’ tlxefipsa Court

daemon in Saria Vwmws mw and we aampt the

/V

1′
§

.. ..r….– – uurrl uvufil Ur EAKNRTAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUFET OF KARNATAKA I-HGHCOUR

cihability mm by Tribunal at 30%

appalhnt will be entitled to an amaunt of
(Rs.2,5OO x 12 x 13 2: 301100) undm tt;c—-!§§jaci”*’i§a§ at »
future wx-15%’ as gains: ?o3,f’ ‘

1:114: tribunal.


3. Further,   amm
Ra.36,€3OOI- as   'has of
"M3" 5  Ex.P5, the

(£4 AAAA     parietai rem.

   rm

4.:s11§;;vs daraal brain hemtarrrhage.

&&&&& “iaf the steam, um appellant had

_ V atm mazmmma. A3 a mun cf
_wIfidh, side mlums azfi was met able to

‘ H he mm: mm indepenclonw witheut the
‘V of aanaeflm pea-son. Taldrg izztn wnsfimaation
aamcm afthe mam, it is aim that the appenant

” Irma so suasm this unhappams and mm

thmugh out Hm lira. Tira, we awn: it fit to award a

9%/”

…-um…— . avwrl uuum Ur KAKNATAKA i-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA !’§lGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR

Pam and sufimrw Ra. 5e,ca=t;’w 4~.._

Eedioal gmau Rs. l5L§!§}t5}_;…

Gonwyemea, nwuriabfing, fomi and Rs.

afimdmt

Loss of amenifiea, fiacamfmu and figpne = ‘4

s

Loss of future ‘ A 3

Futursmedicaleatpmsm Ra.’-.56.9flO;’:.-“~~. ‘

The appellant of
Ra.s,37,ooo1~ as by the
tribunal. coma in
g@ 5% pa. from me

fizfi ‘2:-gooné’ – 112.5121-mm Campany ‘us

“tan enhanced compensatzian with
wwlw fi*om tbs data <31' rwaipt at' a

A 1 of tin Mimi mmpensafion af
L ;eak;2,::$3,m0;–. a sum of RsJ.,75,0001- with
_ ;pI*¢%port'a3zm'£:$ ::r:tm*es" t man be deptmififl in max'

% 'semi: in any Hammlma or Schedukad bank in tha

namoftimapmllmfcrawiodaffixaeyraaraaxxd

9/

~.

'roux    "