High Court Kerala High Court

Habna Jose vs The State Of Kerala Represented By on 22 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Habna Jose vs The State Of Kerala Represented By on 22 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16014 of 2009(V)


1. HABNA JOSE,W/O.DR.P.ARUN RAPHEAL
                      ...  Petitioner
2. PRABHA K.THOMAS, W/O.BOBAN P.J,
3. MARIA TREEBA,  PANIKULAM HOUSE

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR.

4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JIJO PAUL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :22/06/2009

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
              ---------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.16014 OF 2009
              ---------------------------------------
            Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2009.


                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioners herein are working as H.S.A in Physical

Science and English respectively in St. Sebastian High School,

Mannamangalam, Thrissur District in regular vacancies. They are

aggrieved by the orders passed by the District Educational Officer

rejecting the grant of approval relying upon G.O.(P)

No.104/2008/G.Edn dated 10.06.2008, which is produced as

Exhibit P1 herein. Exhibits P3, P5 and P7 are the orders rejecting

the grant of approval.

2. The validity of Exhibit P1 Government Order was under

challenge in various writ petitions before this Court and a Division

Bench of this Court in Unni Narayanan vs. State of Kerala

(2009(2) KLT 604) has held in paragraph 7 that the offending

conditions in Exhibit P2 Government Order cannot stand with the

statutory rules. Therefore, for enforcing them, the relevant rules

require amendment. As long as the rules are not amended,

Exhibit P2 cannot be pressed into service by the Government.

W.P.(C) No.16014/2009 2

3. Finally in paragraph 12, the following directions were

issued:

“In the case of the writ petitioners in these

cases, orders, if any passed, approving their

appointments on daily wage basis, relying on Ext.P2

Government Order are quashed. All appointments,

whether pending approval or already rejected, shall

be considered/reconsidered by the Educational

Officers concerned and fresh orders shall be passed

in the light of the declaration of law made by us in

W.P.(C) No.25176 of 2008. The salary found due to

be paid to the incumbents concerned shall be

released immediately. The action in this regard

shall be completed within six weeks from the date

of production of a copy of this judgment”.

In the light of the above, Exhibits P3, P5 and P7 are

quashed. The District Educational Officer will pass fresh orders in

the light of the directions issued by the Division Bench above

which will govern this case also. Appropriate orders shall be

passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of

a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of

this judgment along with copy of the judgment of the Division

W.P.(C) No.16014/2009 3

Bench referred to above before the District Educational Officer for

compliance.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE

smp