High Court Karnataka High Court

Halappa Bhimappa Hullimuddi vs State Of Karnataka on 12 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Halappa Bhimappa Hullimuddi vs State Of Karnataka on 12 August, 2008
Author: R.B.Naik
EN THE HIGH COURT 01-? KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD 

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AU(}IEjS"T   

BEFORE -  j 

THE HON'BLE MR.aUs*flC.E; I§.B_:.I§AIE{::   V

CRIMINAL PETrr1oN4ANQ¢;%70sé1'2 0£i8  

Between

Halappa Bhimappa Hullignuddi;
Age 48,0cc:Agticu1tur3_    
R/0 Bidamlli, Taluk Mu1idgtI'g*i,..   _   " --
District Gadag.      '

. . Petitioner

(By S;ji'.;'3._\./'.S'cx)1E1a_pu11', §Xd\;o»ofi'eIfzces1i13d'egf

Section 504 and 306 IPC. _  T 1 A L T .

This petition coming onfor  the 
the following: '   V     

-  A

A case in Qr.N"o.  on 8-6-2008 in
Mundargi Police  €}ada:g*AtoiiV"t!ie»ftcompiaint of Avadooth
Chidamber   deceased Shobha. The
complajiiatit   of the petitioner, Yallappa
was going;  the" complainant and deceased for

study. 5 He was   "P. U. C. He failed in the examination.

 é_  that his son had developed illicit

   he abused in foul and filthy ianguage and

  also Astatirtg that his son had failed in PUC because of the said

  Shobha got depressed. She was again

 on 3-6-2008 by the petitioner. She was again

 lid' abused by the petitioner. On 8-6-2008 the complainant i.e., the

A  Iriusband of deceased Shobha went to Gadag and returned back.

Mk-K  V'---



He found the door of the house ioeked from inside': and

smoke was emanating from the house. He  todoor

with the assistance of the neighboiirs«.. A   the dgosr.

and he saw his wife Shot-ha A. 'dead»_:.Aon = 
Thinking that she has   
reprimanded and abused  gyetittonerfj be lodged a
complaint which came is   Cr.No. 103/ 2008 for
offences  306 IPC.

2. Ad1tiittedl§}""Shobi;a""~asfasA":_reprimanded and abused on

3-6-20

Oi8._Aand suicide on 8-6-2008. There is

no mentionizg. of the petitioner having abetted the

_.. ,.comnai§ss1on. vof ti*:.f3..____QI’~fence of suicide immediately prior to

‘ass-5520003 would ran within the definition of Section 107

IFC; in the complaint that he instigated Shobha

to com :3 3 asnicide or he intentionally did any act Iesultm g in

V’ commitmlg suicide and in View of the fact that there is

V. _-«iong ttime gap between the date on which Shobha was

‘ ‘ by the petitioner 1.e., 3-6-2008 and she committing

,4. QL v’\«CLL\.”i-&……,

suicide on 8–6~2GG8. I hold at this stage is

entitled for bail. Hence, the following:

The criminal petition}; Aiélleiared. ‘ is
directed to be enlarged on ¢xe¢u:a,«;g in sum
of Rs.50,000/ — with oneSuI’ci§ fiefifioner shall
mark his attendance Police once in 15

days tiil the fine They shall not tamper
with the .~.ti’3ep or the witnesses for
prosecuf;ion,” ‘

Sd/-Q
Iudgé