High Court Karnataka High Court

Hanumanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner on 25 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Hanumanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner on 25 September, 2008
Author: V.G Sabhahit S.N.Satyanarayana
'A'

cowrechcfi \1\<:\1

c)mcm\m\ oxcism
elk. R-ibog K

'I§k3D(c\E

EN "I'I~§E HIGH coum' 09' KARNATAKA . '  Q 

cracurr BENCH AT DHARWAD  5.: "

DATED THIS THE 25m DAY or sEP'rE:a3--?;;2.V26é§s<-- _  "  

PRESEET

THE HONBLE MR.qrJ_sr1cits--.sk;'c:.sAB}:;»s;:niifr "  

A'»?**U57"--. N =*'---. .
THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE --SiS:A{I'YAI~iARAYA1§iA

c.c.c.Né.23§g_goo3;*c;g;u

BETWEEN :

1

HANiJ¥§mfi;~*xGQU'DA:.  V % _
3/ 0. _LAjfl§{ENAGQ'U.'i)A" 
A<3«;3:_ 49 YEARS   

,'oCc:J*AGRIc;)L'IfU'RfE

'R/0; sANzéA"
"  $.1c.%'AYYAP?:a«~'

Ar3E_s«1¢_ YESARS
'Q_CCViAGRICULTURE

  Rm. PURA VILLAGE
 'rALufK;:AKusmAGx ms? KOPPAL.

 COMPLAINANTS

4:  " .. {By--- LAxMAN.T.MAN'rAGANr, ADV.,)



AND :

SNF1'.(}ANGUBAI MANKAR,
AGE 45 YEARS   
THE ASSESTANT COMMISSIONER  
AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER  '
KOPPAL, TALUK AND DIsTRIc:r KOPPRL.

_ _  H4;ACCG$ED
(By Sri DINESH M0,': 'GovfI';}§IjV?.i.;   

THIS cos: IS EILEI) wss. :1 «AND 12 01? THE
CONTEMPT' _c_w.I1V<:UIe*;Ifs Acrr RIW'-.AHRfI'ICLE 215 01:' THE
CONSPITUTIQN or? 2 IPJDIA_.-- fPRAYING TO INJTIATE
CONTEMPF PR.O<:€:é3DIIs;-r;S-- .A:GAi,NST THE ACCUSED FOR
DISOBEYIIII.G"».T§5{E ORDER DATED 31.5.2007 PASSEI) IN

W.P.NO;'685§'3jO7"3;i'E'DE--;§NNEXU'RE-A.

THIS' Iccc1"cG. 'I:~4;"c}<""<3N FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

smfianrr, _J., M.n.DE_TH_I;-3 FOLLOWING:

ORDER

is filed by the comp1aman’ ts

V -V ag.§iIIs”tI.:1iex.Vaccused alleging disobdienoe to the direction

A isSu§d by this Court in W.P.No.6853/2007 dated

‘AABIIISIQOO7 wherein a direction has been issued to the

K}?

Land Acquisition Officer to consider the

by the writ petitioners. A

2. Heard the learned Zeoutzsei iitioe .

com lainants and the lea:med ‘ (_,’;ove:tnr1ient_ Adtzoeate *

appearing for the accused.

3. The accused Counter
is filed statingthat issued by this
Court he with :jt_E1e_ award passed under

SCCt1.0i’1″-2§L§’Lj ‘f’ Act (for short the

% tA Section 28A of the Act dated 24.6.2008.

vytvttiefiverment made in the aflidavit by way of

coumezf,’ ‘ are satisfied that there is no willful

to the direction issued by this Court and

\J_) _

the direction has men complied Wth. Ac

contempt petiticnis disposed of.M

The accused is dischar~ged ::__ A.

% . Jjqudge
sa/..%
Judge;