IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CHRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA
amen ms THE 1:?" DAY 0? JULY 2393" "
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR. JUS"?'lCE"'1*£.K."--«§?A??;!§?fi* .
wan' Pgjmore NO. ss21¢;%r2s 9s §__,«gEs% 1%
BEEWEEN:
HANUMANTH
SIC}. MADAPPA mm
AGE 35 YEARS ' VA
R1€}.i»<UMS%,
KUMSWVAEJEPCLJCE srxmosxs '- ._ .
WAi)i~TA§.UK, * A
D¥ST.GULBARGA,
_ _ A _ ' P§:E'§'tTéQNER
{av 83:. §<AL.€Er.e:L;:LL._e:\'é¥i' é;»4Aéé?§r'.-i,; »§:3v.cscA*;E)"
AND «««« " " Vv
1.
THE s’fATE~0:= s<fi§f%::~€AvT§és+iA"- '
REPRESENTED B'? :73 §.f:*E_CF2–ETAR\",
DEPT. OF H;_OME, . ,.
VIDHANA SOEJEEHA SA{\1G}3LU5?E.560 G81.
_ V 2. THE. éfisvpuw camexsstorqssmg
GL1L_E§AF?;£§AD§STRfCT;”‘ —–
»:3,u;.,”=3ARcAx _
3. %H£’s2s§iEa2:a4%*EV:x1é_§::r¢I oz-‘ F-*{}Li{3E,
GU-;.3,ARL;A”_oss”r~.§;cT,
<3;.;a.BAm3;g_ ' – v
.. RESPGMBENTS
" ' " '{3}? azmza. :<i;'a.%AR, ASA )
Wtfit
THiS WRET PET§"§'§{}N E3 HLES UNDER ARTECLES 226 AM} 227 {BF
T}H'E"CQNST1TUT¥ON OF Hfiéflffi, PRAYFNG TO QRECT THE RESP{'.'1§'~éQEN"£'S
T0 FEX THE HONORARiU?s'E FBXYABLE T0 'FHE PETETFONER EN
ACGQRQANCE wan-3 RULE '$8-E OF "EH5 KARNATAKA VELLAGE SEFENCE
PARTLES RULES, '3%5, EXTRACT OF WHKSH ES PROSUCED AT
petitiener Es workieg as Deiepethy £2': Kumei Wadi viiiage,
Gufibarge District sauce 23'" April 2002 as per theirT"'effic%aE
record and his name is found at Si,Ne/101
vitiege comes under their Rufai Peééce Stetiefy V':
Bet, petétéener has not p:'educeci=__eny..eiAe*:e1ef .deeumen£:eé*
correspondence or any eppiieaiéeev_eee§<in§"',1;ae.y§}je3e%%e€ '
heeorarium as permieeibie z_._1__:L%*':'%:-.'.e:**~.t_»§':e Kefeeteétie Vifiege
Defenee Parties Ruiee, ef redfesséng his
qrievancee befere tbe""ee-itzpeient etzéfieritiee, petitioner
has rue§'sezi:Af?e "«CeeA?tv' e'r%fi'~'p?eeented the instant wrifi
petitiee, " ' ' é
_ 3. heve'v*.Heer6';ieemed eeuneei appearing fer
pe';i'E§er3'er ezfwd i'e'e7Vf%éed Addiéienei Government Advocate
epfiee:fifi.g ':"er~ reependents.
4; ‘ carefui peruse! of the groande urged by
iee§neti=..ceeneel appearing for petétierzer in the writ
‘eetiiien, whet emerges is ‘that, petitioner has neither’
“eubmitted any representation nor made any
correspondence threegh proper channel as envisaged
under the Karnataka Viiiage Defence Parties Ruies.
Without redressing his grievances befare the a:2’£h0?_ities,
petitioner has straightaway rushed to this
presented the instant wrii petitian Theieforei arm:
View that the reiief sought for i:ie’§ii§;§i3″:ssfr
writ petition is premature _ii%_ natiiref Ho$i.?é:x:ér,A’ if; fhef
interest of justice and equity,’v’ti:.i._;év.’ writ iietifiiaii iéiifdisposed
of, permitting the ‘[.A*:r§:_.¥'{Vi’ii_cA)rie::V–_wifc:” his detaiiec!
representation tr; thei.i}«u:iisdi§t%§n_aiA.”::§i’iévpé’ient authority,
within fol§r..1}veL¥§§s;’_ fa*§a?i*rjA1’t!j!e giéiéiidfiféceipt 0? a aepy of
this ofderfi If eéiiiéifuiiijiegiiiééfiiaiioniappiication is made, the
competeni”*«aL:i:3’i:;3rityis ‘a:£ii*ected ta receive the same and
pass’asppropriatécmiér in accordance with iaw and in the
:iK§.rna*tai<a Viiiage Defence Pasties Ruies,
i965 gaiziflaxiiépese af the same, as expeditiousiy as
pqssiiaivag at any rate, within three months fram the date
"Ac§f":"'e€:eipt of representaiionlappiication from petitisner.
/._m__M…
5
5. Learned Adéiiicnm Government Advocate és_…___
permitted to We memo cf appmrance on behaff
respcnderzts within three weeks from today.
W