High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Hapo Rai @ Raj Kumar Rai @ Hatho Rai & … vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Hapo Rai @ Raj Kumar Rai @ Hatho Rai & … vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28759 of 2011
               1. Hapo Rai @ Raj Kumar Rai @ Hatho Rai, S/o
                  Vishwanath Rai, R/o Vill- Maner, Balupur, P.S-
                  Maner, Dist-Patna.
               2. Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar, S/o Vishwanath Rai, R/o
                  Vill- Maner, Balupur, P.S- Maner, Dist-Patna.
               3. Sunil Rai @ Sunil Kumar, S/o Vishwanath Rai, R/o
                  Vill- Maner, Balupur, P.S- Maner, Dist-Patna.
                                           Versus
                                   1. The State of Bihar
                                       ----------------

02. 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 and 307 of

the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that after the present First

Information Report was instituted the matter has been

compromised between the parties which has been

annexed as Annexure-2.

In view of such, let the petitioners, above named

be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or

surrender before the learned Court below within a period

of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on

furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each

with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in

connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 subject

to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
2

Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the

following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that

the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if

they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the

court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any

other case of similar nature after their release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if

they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioners will be well

represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two

consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-