High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Hare Ram Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 9 November, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Hare Ram Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 9 November, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.34832 of 2011
                                   Hare Ram Paswan
                                           Versus
                                   The State Of Bihar
                                         -----------

2 09-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by

this court vide order dated 04-03-2011passed in Cr. Misc. No.

1924 of 2011 considering his criminal antecedent as well as this

aspect of the matter that the petitioner has been identified by the

witnesses in Test Identification Parade but this petition has been

filed on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner

has been made accused for an offence under Section-392 of the

Indian Penal Code and he is in jail custody since 04-06-2009, i.e.

for more than two years.

Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and

circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the

petitioner, namely, Hare Ram Paswan be released on bail on

furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each in connection with Nalanda P.S.

Case No. 43 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif subject to condition that the

petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in

person for a period of nine months and if he fails to do so on three

consecutive dates without any genuine reason or within the

above-said period, any new case is registered against the

petitioner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the
2

bail bonds of the petitioner. Furthermore, it goes without saying

that the learned trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude

the trial of the petitioner within the above-said period.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)
A.K. Vishwakarma/-