Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.


Allahabad High Court
Harinath Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 2 July, 2010
Court No. - 47

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15499 of 2010

Petitioner :- Harinath Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- K.S. Tiwari,Vivek Tiwari
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble B.N. Shukla,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Radhey Shyam
Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent and learned A.G.A.
appearing for the State.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is father-in-law and in the statement of Rajiv Kumar,
who is brother of the deceased and witness Shankar Lal there is
nothing against the applicant.

Learned Private counsel for the respondent and learned A.G.A.
contended that applicant being father -in-law was responsible for
the safe custody of the deceased. Deceased had died within seven
years of marriage.

Applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. No overtact has been
assigned to the applicant.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the
applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Harinath Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 72
of 2010 , under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 352 IPC and section 3/4 of
Dowry Prohibition Act Police Station Vindyachal District
Mirzapur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond
with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
court concerned.

Order Date :- 2.7.2010
Aks


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.103 seconds.