High Court Kerala High Court

Hariprasad vs The Circle Inspector Of Police on 20 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
Hariprasad vs The Circle Inspector Of Police on 20 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 804 of 2009()


1. HARIPRASAD, S/O.BHASKARAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.G.THAMPI (SR.)

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :20/02/2009

 O R D E R
                                 K. HEMA, J.
                 ---------------------------------------------------
                         Bail Appl. No. 804 of 2009
                 ---------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 20th day of February, 2009.

                                     ORDER

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147,

148, 341, 324, 452, 307 and 149 of IPC and section 27 of the

Arms Act. According to prosecution, petitioner, along with 15

other accused, formed into an unlawful assembly and armed

with deadly weapons committed rioting and also wrongfully

restrained de facto complainant and attempted to commit

murder, after committing house trespass into the house of de

facto complainant in prosecution of the common object of the

unlawful assembly.

3. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in the crime. Learned

counsel for petitioner submitted that first and 3rd accused are

already granted bail by learned Sessions Judge, but the bail

application filed by petitioner was dismissed on the ground that

petitioner is involved in another crime registered under Section

302 IPC. But the learned Sessions Judge missed to take note of

the fact that accused were granted statutory bail. Petitioner was

[B.A.No.804/09] 2

arrested on 1.12.2008 and he is in custody for the past 83 days.

He is prepared to abide by any condition, It is submitted. As per

the instruction, petitioner was taken into custody much earlier to

the alleged date of arrest and he was in illegal custody of the

police, it is submitted.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that he has no

objection in granting bail but stringent conditions may be

imposed.

5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can

be granted to petitioner on conditions. Hence, the following order

is passed:

Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing

bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent sureties each

for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate

Court concerned, the following conditions:

i) Petitioner shall report before the

investigating officer on every Monday,

Wednesday and Saturday between 10 a.m.

and 1 p.m. until further orders.

ii) Petitioner shall not leave the limits of the

police station, within which the crime is

[B.A.No.804/09] 3

registered, except with previous

permission of the learned Magistrate.

iii) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate

any witness or tamper with evidence or

commit any offence while on bail and, in

case of breach of this condition, bail is

liable to be cancelled.

This petition is allowed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE.

Krs.