High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Harish Kumar And Another vs The State Bank Of Bikaner And … on 5 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Harish Kumar And Another vs The State Bank Of Bikaner And … on 5 November, 2009
CWP No.14015 of 2009
                                                                      -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                   CWP No.14015 of 2009
                                   Date of decision : 5-11-2009


Harish Kumar and another

                                                   .... Petitioners

                              VERSUS

The State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur

                                                  ....Respondent


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA


Present:   Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate,
           for the petitioners.

           Mr. H.C. Gupta, Advocate,
           for the respondent.


KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral)

Counsel for the respondent has stated that the petitioners had

taken a term loan and the amount outstanding on 31.10.2009 is

Rs.6,11,797/-. He further submitted that cash limit was granted by the Bank

in the name of Dev Jewellers, firm run by the petitioners. The amount

outstanding in this account is Rs.5,89,103/- on 31.10.2009.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that term loan of

Rs.6,11,797/- shall be paid by him in nine equated instalments along with

interest which shall accrue on the amount. It is further submitted that the

entire amount pertaining to the cash limit account shall be paid back by the

petitioners within a one and half year from today. However, petitioners in

this period of one and a half year will not exceed and overdraw, over and

above the sanctioned limit.

Counsel for the respondent has stated that the proposal made
CWP No.14015 of 2009
-2-

by the counsel for the petitioners is acceptable, provided no default occurs

and liberty is granted to the respondents to proceed against the petitioners

in accordance with law in case two defaults occur while adhering to the

above arrangement. Counsel for respondent Bank has further stated that

no penal interest will be charged and the instalment should commence

from 1.12.2009.

Counsel for the parties have expressed that the broad consensus

has been arrived between the parties and in view of the statements made

above and noticed in this order, the present writ petition be disposed of.

Ordered accordingly.





                                   (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA)
5-11-2009                                      JUDGE
manju