Gujarat High Court High Court

Harisingh vs State on 13 May, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Harisingh vs State on 13 May, 2010
Author: A.L.Dave,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/5152/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 5152 of 2010
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1074 of 2003
 

 
=========================================================

 

HARISINGH
@ HARIOM LAXMANSINGH GRAM GORKHA-CONVICT PRISONER - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
JAYSHREE C BHATT for
Applicant(s) : 1,MR MAHESH B BARIYA for Applicant(s) :
1,PARTY-IN-PERSON for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR M.R. MENGDEY ADDL.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1-
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/05/2010  
ORAL ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

Heard party-in-person, who is present, before the Court.

2. By
this application, the party-in-person seeks temporary bail for
prisoner, Harisingh @ Hariom Laxmansingh, on the ground of marriage
of her relatives. The party-in-person, in the alternative, prays for
fixing the date of hearing of the appeal.

3. The
prisoner had absconded for 196 days between June and December 2009,
during which, his appeal was fixed for hearing but could not be taken
up because of
his abscondence.

4. Looking
to the past conduct of the applicant, his case for temporary bail
cannot be considered. Even otherwise also, no case is made out for
suspending the sentence and granting bail, even temporarily.

5. So
far as the request for expediting the hearing is concerned, the
appeal is of 2003 and it will be fixed for hearing in due course. At
this stage (last two days of working before summer vacation), it is
not proper to fix the roster after the vacation.

6. Under
the circumstances, neither of the prayer can be accepted. The
application stands rejected.

(A.L.

DAVE, J.)

(BANKIM
N. MEHTA, J.)

zgs/-

   

Top