Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Harshad vs Pallaviben on 21 October, 2011
Author: Ks Jhaveri,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/3275/2006	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 3275 of 2006
 

=========================================================

 

HARSHAD
RAMESHCHANDRA BARDOLIA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

PALLAVIBEN
PANKAJBHAI PATEL & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
RR MARSHALL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR UTPAL M
PANCHAL for Respondent(s) : 2, 
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s)
: 3, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/10/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned Senior Advocate Mr.R.R.Marshall for the applicant.

Prima
facie, this is a case where the complaint is required to be quashed.
However, learned advocate Mr.Panchal appearing for respondent No.2 is
not present.

In
view of that matter, to enable learned advocate, Mr.Panchal to
represent his case, the matter to come up on 18.11.2011.

It
is made clear that learned advocate, Mr.Panchal will not turn up on
next date of hearing, the matter will proceed ex-parte and the
contention of the applicant will be accepted.

(K.S.JHAVERI
,J.)

(vipul)

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

103 queries in 0.454 seconds.