Allahabad High Court High Court

Harveer vs State Of U.P. on 2 August, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Harveer vs State Of U.P. on 2 August, 2010
Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19934 of 2010

Petitioner :- Harveer
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- Mahipal Singh
Respondent Counsel :- Govt.Advocate

Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the
record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely
implicated. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in
the present case co accused Patwari @ Raj Kumar, whose case stands on the
same footing, has been granted bail by this court on 27.07.2010, in Criminal
Misc. Bail Application No. 13047 of 2010 and has claimed parity. This fact
has not been disputed by the learned A.G.A. He further submits that the
applicant is in Jail since 19.04.2010.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the
accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for
the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

Let the applicant Harveer involved in Case Crime No. 478 of 2009, under
Section 364 IPC, P.S. Partapur, District Meerut be released on bail on his
furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;

(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

(iv)The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week
of each month to show his good conduct and behavior.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions , the court below shall be at
liberty to cancel the bail.

Order Date :- 2.8.2010
Vinay/v.k.updh.