Hasiru Sports And Recreation vs The Superintendent Of Police on 6 August, 2010

 

1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARIIATAKA AT BANGALORE

DA'1'ED THIS THE Sm DAY OF AUGUST 2010 

BEFORE

THE I-IONBLE MRJUSTICE now-m  T'   V 

 

Banga]ore- MyaorcRoeu'i;~..A_ 
Baburaq-,ranaKoppa1u,  ~  2 H
Represaented     'V 
S/0. Kn]egowzf1a,--::__     
   
Kotlmtfifiobgfli,  '
Mandya  V    PE'I'I'I'IONER

  (By  15.  Adv.)

%  f   I A
 lo    I1der1tofPo1io¢

  ' a«~D'B1:rict,
Mnmdya.

''     VT  Superintendent of Police

 "%a1Jgnpattann,



 

2

3. Circle inspector ofPo]1'oc
Sri_1-angapattana Polka.-. Station,
SnraJ:Igap.I_1ttn.1:1n,

Mandya District.

4. Sub Inspector ofPo1ioe
S1-irangapattnna Police Statiaxyh _
Srirangapattann, 

Mandya D'ntrict.  

(By S1-:1. Namndraprasad, V' "

This writ petition    226 and
22'? of the Conntitufon of .133 direct the
respondents --  newts' jizterfere with' the activities

of the pefltionym’-4,. to insist the

petitinnnr tn indoor gaxnea

Vféf preliminary hearing

t 9 gig E E

LA ” fiar the raapondtmta.

“‘2 According to the petitziontzr, it is an association

VT unicr the provisions of Karnataka Societies

H >

5. I-Iaztzurm, the writ petifimz is liable ‘:9 R fifmpcsfi
of fialimving the azfiazr pasm. in
3»%1’dH’1E1Y:fl’1e§a!bwn1g’ crderis :i.=_/’fi*iL».,f1> ” * v V

(3!!!-no

5. pefivgsnar is :5
repmmmagn m the with
at-gzias ef mefiggagr G1′
‘ ‘ Court in
ssmfla: mm the dam cf
rib: 1 V? (311 mmipt: af such

are é m pass

appmgériatge iaeciaarx-darm with Law after
apgmrmrziiy ts the pmifisner and ‘an

fisrigtpetiaan £5 waged qf’az:’:»mr&m§y.

this arfim ahali nut come in the way czf

‘ rfipfindsnm Ram via£t::r1g’ the yefitienm’ ta msrmitcr

V