Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
CA/5847/2010 1/ 2 JUDGMENT
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 5847 of 2010
IN
SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 30288 of 2007
For
Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
=========================================================
1
Whether
Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2
To be
referred to the Reporter or not ?
3
Whether
their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
4
Whether
this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
made thereunder ?
5
Whether
it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
=========================================================
HAWABIBI
WD/O AHMED ADAM MULLA & 3 - Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT & 3 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance
:
MR
KK TRIVEDI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2,1.2.3 - 4.
MR NIRAJ SONI
ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent Nos.1 & 2,
None for
Respondent(s) : 2, 4,
MR DHAVAL G NANAVATI for Respondent(s) :
3,
=========================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Date
: 22/06/2010
ORAL JUDGMENT
RULE.
Mr.Niraj Soni, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives the
service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2
and Mr.Dhaval Nanavati, learned
advocate waives the service of notice of Rule on
behalf of the respondent No.3.
With
the consent of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties present application is taken up for final herein
today.
Present
application has been preferred by the applicants herein heirs
and legal representatives of the original petitioner
No.1 of Special
Civil Application No. 30288 of 2007, permitting them
to bring the heirs of the original petitioner
No.1 as mentioned in para 3 of the application on
record of the Special
Civil Application No. 30288 of 2007.
Having
heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties and considering the fact that other co-owners of the
property in question are already on record, the application is
allowed and the applicants are permitted to being the heirs and
legal representatives of the original petitioner
No.1 as mentioned in para 3 of the application on
record of the Special
Civil Application No. 30288 of 2007. Rule is made
absolute accordingly to the aforesaid extent. No costs.
[M.R.
SHAH, J.]
rafik
Top