Gujarat High Court High Court

Hayat vs State on 17 June, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Hayat vs State on 17 June, 2008
Author: J.R.Vora,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/4877/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 4877 of 2008
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1364 of 2008
 

=========================================================

 

HAYAT
DAWOOD DAFER & 1 - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
SHAKEEL A QURESHI for
Applicant(s) : 1 - 2. 
MR M.R. MENGDEY APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 17/06/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)

Objections,
if any, be removed during the course of the day.

RULE.

Mr.M.R. Mengdey, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor waives the service
of notice of rule on behalf of the State.

By
way of this application, the applicants ? original accused have
prayed for an appropriate order to condone the delay of 93 days in
preferring the Criminal Appeal challenging the judgement and order
of conviction passed by the trial court convicting the applicants ?
original accused Nos.2 and 3 for the offences punishable under
secs.325, 333, 186 r/w sec.114 of Indian Penal Code.

We
have heard Mr.Shakeel Qureshi, learned advocate appearing on behalf
of the applicants and Mr.M.R. Mengdey, learned APP for the State.

We
have considered the averments in the application in support of the
prayer to condone the delay and so as to give one opportunity to the
applicants ? original accused Nos.2 and 3 to submit the case on
merits rather than non-suiting the applicants on the technical
ground of delay, we condone the delay of 93 days in preferring the
Criminal Appeal. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

[J.R.

VORA, J.]

[M.R.

SHAH, J.]

rafik

   

Top