High Court Karnataka High Court

Hical Technologies Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka By Its … on 31 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Hical Technologies Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka By Its … on 31 December, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala

H orWé%MN,m*rAm mm”

W *«~.M«=4’%.a’i?K’ WW rsmmwmwmfl was-a mum 05 KARNATAKA Mgfiw mm

m 3% maxi CQURT SF KA.R1’I5TAEi£§, BA.I*¥€}£gL§i5§2f€Eif » A
mfmm Tazzs Tim 31%’? my arr gacsamfié J ‘

sgmxg

ma §~IQ§*BLE §R. wsfisn

wfl Pfimzsn §0§3§§?? 2909 %: ;1v2~§~+oxi;;}c%3%3k

BETWEK :

Hzcm mcaxaxgam Pmi[%:,=;’:;%~. _ v_ A’ A’
$'{,I*§$,% & 4?, Ew<.:':*R:3NIca:c::*;'2* .&

PHAsE£,H<::sufR 3555,53

REF BY' sm.'3UJ$¥A s¥'HA,sH_£fim 'g
E;mczr*x':2IET.§I';E:;E:ci€*:;:R " PE'T'1'I*IOHER
gm 3R§.§i}'_§e'£§fl&TE)

fidiéfiz V'

…..-n……..g.–…»

z. swam $5' m§;Eé?m:

* % E”;”__I”;t%a_?RE:.*, SECRE’;i15fi;R¥

‘ £%iE§P’1″,£;l»*,”S’§i{3…§fi
_ zmzimg’ 3{3¥,fl?l?§iA
” §é”%”‘§:%¥*’3m'”¥$~’i?”Ri._E5’ * ‘ ”

3, asmfisszzéfigg 3? ?GZ.–E’23}E

* 3, Ai{s.§S?5EGTGR 9;’ waxes
* % -k %.%§am?ga; AG wzim
$TA’£’i§I¥, mmamgg –~ age ms

#3 83$»-‘%PE€3’i%R SF PQTLICE?

? A fiG P’QLI{iE
§*E’.§§’§$fi§ fifisfifififififi -~ 35$ EQQ

5. Kamwam W$RKERS’?i.3’Ifi’IGH
arm smmx, v.s»,.ssmz,
azmsaza, 33.29; 1% Laxmesz
mm Ram,
Bme.amm–~5ae am j;

zezzrsvsxamasmm *
am aszrmmn 3E$RE’I’ARfY_ %

5, $m.M.mazmm wmm
am <::,v.w;mw
AGE: 2'?YEARS
cm amaze REES? 'BI.}"E.flf£€i'}; %
oweszrfi FANCY swam 1
Kcmypam Asgamaa jy
ELEGTRGKIQ yam. W .

mt:

*3. 8RI*GfiP1’§2X’I’§’I.€§i« ‘.
gm t_;.cH3.2£=3R£:aE:EKA§e;

A9322? . %

; I¥£3>.6§’3fi,’–3?51′ ¢§::23_$–. % ‘ s

5 573 Emma, ”

‘ as 5553 we

3. sR§$,M>..h£ADHU8:i:EA.R
‘~ _ agar }9a.i§{.2££;HE3H’fié?AR%I?A
3.4232: 232 v’¥1?!&.Rf$
:.::,.é:3 ?R§{}VIS£€§fi swms
“‘ ‘ n.~s;m§;%:*z”2* PALYA.

E3′.-Ei..’§”i’RQ}§”i{Ii %r::m* ms’?

— sees me

% § ~ & ‘$3.zrs;;2;s&n~nvasA
% ~~j_*;.%1.V€§E:u3€!YE%
% _ 359 mamm Kzmarz
s ggmxgvmamcgsommg

* _;S.?E£E’Z”‘i’Y FALYA

” EL-E$’3″‘RQEIG £33′? F93’?
«~ E§§§§’&8.%RE – 568 ESQ §E$?{}23ifiE5E’1″S

” SRZ.§E.S,E%’EEESH, 3&5?)

uh…-..