High Court Karnataka High Court

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited vs The Regional Transport Officer on 10 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited vs The Regional Transport Officer on 10 November, 2010
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
1

as TEE 1-«ma Comm 9? Kamarazzs AT smesapmz  

warm Tms THE ma may ms' NOVE 

'THE HfiI*¥'ELE am. JUSIYSE A3:«:ai:s:':a. H§§is,§.'3oi;*§;';2gg,§____3 :>F%2&m%%rfeI§avr:%

Hmnusrm AEROHAUTIC$_'L}MI?ED _   " .
REPRE$EI€f{'E§ BYi'I'SAE§}I'£*I€.3§AL " :7 1- 
GENERAL Mafiamzrg g  _  -  '
i3'AC3..rI'Y ££Ar{.£:c+;"€§,Is§EI~:'r_ D§V'i8I€3fi_  ' 'V 
HAL,    »
 aéifim?  »  

 %%%%    ' €53? fiD'€Z,3

 PE'I"E'I'IDNEI'3

Alfi

E. THE 2Ei}:Q'r;a£~?Rm€a§§oR? GFFICER
 amwmmax {EAST}

  ..... 

“,2. “THE2_S~’I’g6Ef’3E <3? Iauwamxg

.. .;-*::fHRcszJ$HT-*-I?EiE mgpammm an
'– A zgm'c:u3;vEmcLE:2 mmrzmr
'«,R_:EP}?£i'.'%.S}jE1Vi'EE BY frs 3EfiRE'i'ARY
E S'B'£.TH,EiI1*I§

_ 563991 Rssymmmm

(BY sRz:K.M.sJ~1IvA¥<;:3IswAm; Hflfifi

TEESE 'WEI'? ?E"I'T1'I{3l'¥S ARE FEED IIHIIER ARTICLE

"' :2§ 2 1& Mm 22? $12 THE CGHSTITIPEIGN ca}? mum mgvrwa
'rm nmmm THE Psczvmxcays <3? RULE .32 'mm

K!&R]§'ATPsK& H{3'I'QR VEI-{ISLE 'I'AJCA'I'I{3N RULES 1%? AS
WELL .513 SECTIQH 25(3) (3? THE T£KA M31133
VEEQCLE '!'AXA'1'§{3H AS'? (IF 195'? AS AZ'! £3'? 9?'
EXfiE3E§"ifE §E3.»EGA"{*IC¥H I1'? 39 FARAS PETTTIDEER CIIKLY

2

AND QUASH THE 8¥.IL§M€.”)1’§’$ §SUED BY THE L D
§££i{I72ISTRi’€T’E IS §,,C.HO,5.3′?’ T0 54C’f10 mm 546 Ti}
553;’ 1% §&TEI.”} 215′ 36 RES1~’E{3T{‘%e*’E£Y VE§E &I’3R’EXURES-
BTGB’}3§¥”EiE”I”{3.

THESE PETIFIGES comm ear: FQR afiaéks

BAY, THE CGURT KABE THE FQLLQWEIG:

3:-1 S.’v”.S1*msm’i, the _.1ea_ fer %

pfifitjssvntr submim am a 2=11,s0;w3i-«k%g1§fipm
afeven Iakth fifty the
firs: rmapanémi Von that the

amzmtv an aarfier data, as

the Gaiggréi hpctitianer Cmmpany was

hn3p’im3is$§;~ a 1s,v.i’:::’«.:. é1:bmi% that the wc:ampti:’.:InT

– .% }’:.s?’lm’§.,.i:;3<:3;ay,

tksa mpianatinrx afi'e1m;, E

H VV _ extefifi far smmplyirzg with tlffi $mzr%.':a mfier,

% '4 , 4; 2.*s;is–2a1a 511 may.

3, $231 K.M.Shimyag§awam§='; the Eaarnfi

» Gevwmmi Piaasder a far the mapmadants

aizbmim £1132 thaa rmpswenm wouifl mt preacipimm the

mafia' by gm-aftgiw ts': tha gcéw mmvary of the
fl.BH

3

amunim far 9, pesrirzci at’ two mantba 62′ till the dispaaal

sf firm pefitit1nm”s wcemptfian. petzitzhn beifi

Sesctfisn 16 of the Kaxmtal-mt Mata: Vehiciaj _

8:84;, 1%? [ ‘the Act’ for short}. –«

in flaw cf the suhsequaant

amvw far mnaidwafisn mf

4. Recmrdhmg sf
Gfi fli Pfieadar $31631 an

beizafi’ exit’ the &i$§:$i$fi…?£’fhese petitinrzs,

aantintijgxgv “gay ‘ pm in
c.car@as.3:3? tn 545-551/2313 gauging

an fig:-.~; a f’ 5f the Metropolitan Mawkwam,

m, far 3. para!” :1 3f

until the tlfapmaal cf aha pe¥3′.ticnm*”‘$

_ &ing ifieé. umiar Section 16 cf ‘ck

. .4 , ‘; 1 ‘ ‘ _£gst;”‘§’1’n’c:haever is mrfia.

5’ Heacilms ta csmarve that all tha cxzzztxntisxm

V . 4 are imp: span. Ifthe autmme cf $33 exaempsfioza gefitisn

is aévame to the: i’£’1tfi’&$E sf the; pefitiacrzmg it Mr: aiwaya

53H.

6

exarcfie the liberty af challanging the

acmréanm with 233?.

VGE