Honnurappa vs C Nataraj on 11 September, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KA'R2»EATA£<A A71' B§kN_

 '   mamas. 

Yeragunte,

Davana9éfé;f?1 fi¥7" z ' V9"""L,A§pe11ant;
(By.§a4AkEaw~39st4 K G.Nat&raj }
AND: ' i., % . W %

'. i0rry'Gwnér_No.KA~l6/633

*.'Biia¢hodufGrama,

'AJégal§ra ?é1uk,
Bévaaagerei3é€-

.  fi, The %énager,

 W 'Tfié Grientai Insuraace Co. Ltd.,

_?J.C. Road, Tumkur. ..8espondents.

* CO P)
 g' ;;z.,.: f:'x?«sz:  -.. Jfé ' ' 2p' '
i _. S K 5,-.--T .,  .. .
  
/:5/391 sznfmw



WA. No, 1.3882/0?:
12%

Miscelxanéous First Appeal filed U/S.3O(li§f.g:" K.
WC Act against the Judgmefit dt.23.6.2007 pa3se§fiifiu.=_
WC. Ne.i36/2006 on the file of the Léfieefi Qffgcer, _=~

and Commissiener for workmen's C9mpensati3n; '~_

E Davanagere, paptly allowing the cyaifi péiitiwfi f§r_ §

compensation and seeking enhancem§nf ef cémpefisatién.

This Miscellaneous Fifét Eg§§al ¢bming an for

Orders this Jay, ta; Cfiu§f-@gfié'thé following:

§I--w.n  -

ggasga
One week's time 5; qragtea ea fiomply with
office objgcfiohs.§?§iiin§~@hi§h, ihé appeal stands

dismissed wifh¢utVrefé:§nfie to the Eench.

 .....  

JUWJE,

,?coPx
3 ‘\*”

I “,«,ggi5raz11’. R’£?é’i§.’5[I”R\ .3

Ha: an hm
f3 .

*é¥,

1/

~ – “gt ~. »
‘4Q§}”‘”-(3LIt’1 ml i<z'n'mu.ai<: V 5 f