Karnataka High Court
Hubli Saraku Sagannikedarra … vs Shaukatali S/O Moulasab Mulla on 8 September, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 3TH DAY 91? SEPTEMBER 2ot)a§L--Iw: _
BEFORE
THE HOPPBLE MRJUSFICE
CRIMINAL PEITPION ao.¢e%m;2ov8»II I
BETWEEN:
Hubli Saraku Sagannikedarra .
Sahakmi Pattina j' V ..
R10 Room No. 1 Ifird Float," Eureka
Trafic Island, Hubli, =
Represented by its Mane' ~"r,. I
Shri Chandmsclrlgar, Sip
I3.
RI 0: Room No..i_.. II§r£:1Vi*'l9ox:._ Eurelm Towers,
Trafic 'island, Huiafii, Dis'£;--'j¢'t-- shamed. ...Petitionc:r
(By sn: M.G,_MaIa§a§Ié;.Ad:§3a¢ate)
.:;a__1~_:,:;i2.,:
. Slo Moulasab Muna,
_ 23£gc:" -4:8 T_Ci{:c: Business,
"R/'O; Kafiafisaihfiujlding, Ghantikcri
Oni,°I~lubli at Osmaaiya Coiony
BijapurV___E'€t>a;d, Afiaaipur, Dist: Guibarga. ...Rcspondent
............-.4.
A criminal pctiuon is filed under Section 482 ofthe
V '€5otia"of mammal' ' Procedure prawn' g to quash the impugned
order dated 10.06.2008 passed thereby direct the restoration
..._of the Private Complaint C.(3.No.I261/2006 on the file of
JMFC 11 Court, I-lubli, ibr disfil on merits according to
law.
This criminal petition coming on for oxticrs this day,
the Court made the following:
1/
OR!)ER
Heard the kearned cmmsei for the .
time. Dunn' g the course of his _;a1fgume1:_:t'.§,"' "' 'V
counsel for the petifionerv submitted
to press the pefition and avail 5; >
filing a revision. Accordingly, a mmo
reads as under: .. V 1 A"
" Herein, the submits
memo as finder. V' 'A V' H «V
1.
. In” pf” petitioner
intentia. 1f§;reee 1:¢t ien jbefore Hon’blc Est
Judge, Dhaxwad,
at-.Hub1i.– petition is not
_
‘V aocoxfiingly the present
V Pefliieii is not pressed, with a liberty to
‘-pm-sent Revision before appropriate
.t<§T:ifieet ends ofjustioe. '
Hence this memo not pressing the
Petitien."
In View of the said memo, this criminal petition is
i as not pressed.
sd/-L
Judge