IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 11832 of 2010(D)
1. HUSSAINAR A., S/O.ABDULLA,
... Petitioner
2. AYSHA NAVEA NOORUDHEEN, THANNAL,
3. JASNA K.P., EDAKKANAMBETH HOUSE,
4. CIBI CHANDRA, SREE NILAYAM,
5. SUCHITHRA VISWANATHAN, ENCY, ARIYALLUR
6. SHARAN N.S., N.S.NIVAS, KARIYAM,
7. ANITHA AMBAT, AMBAT HOUSE,
Vs
1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED
... Respondent
2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS
For Petitioner :SRI.T.MADHU
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Dated :06/04/2010
O R D E R
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.11832 OF 2010
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners were the students of Calicut University
Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kozhikode for B.Tech
Information Technology Degree course for the period 2005-2009.
The petitioners appeared for the 6th semester supplementary
examination conducted in June 2009 and when the result of the
same was published in March 2010, the petitioners except the
7th petitioner have failed for one paper namely, IT 04 602 (Data
Base Management Systems). The 7th petitioner, in addition to
the above paper, failed for another paper namely, IT 04 603
(Computer Networks). The petitioners have submitted
applications for revaluation of the above papers as per
Exhibits P1 to P7.
2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to
the respondents to consider and take appropriate action on
Exhibits P1 to P7 applications for revaluation submitted by the
W.P.(C) No.11832/2010 2
petitioners as expeditiously as possible. It is submitted that the
petitioners are having offers for employment from different
companies and unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that
may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner.
3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to
complete the process of revaluation.
In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there
will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation of
the papers as applied for in Exhibits P1 to P7 and communicate
the results thereof to the petitioners within a period of two
months from the last date of receipt of the applications.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE
smp