High Court Karnataka High Court

Ibrahim vs Chennappa S/O Devappa Poojary on 8 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Ibrahim vs Chennappa S/O Devappa Poojary on 8 December, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
w....~wmu 'man Ksut"«mubmm'mz1w'a»i\A£*"'aA was-wcaww wwwmw marv: wwmmwmwmwwm meeww ww'Mbm§ %.»M""  emwm K.»-M

Ira: THE "f-TIE!-1' mun? as K1%Rfi.3%TAi0°~. AT BAN3Af.:GRE.
wasp: was 3342 93*' my cm zmttmrmsa 2Q€§ .»-. _ ._
: 3399323 : ' '

am man' 51.: rmmsmzcz N.x,1?3:rt:z:;. §f: .

mar: PE'I.'I'I'IC.*1~I R0. 12012 .c>i;'. 2;_r3_§& gégumg  X ( 1:'

EKTWEEN:

IBRAHIM,

axe» mam xzmnzm, ' 4_ . 
AGEE A303'? 44 vzans,"  *
REA? SMBRULI K}"n'.abERIV_,V_ ' 
mmm row .5; "¥I_ILLM;K,'> 
BELXPI-x'2MIE5ADI~' *I"§;3,_.',' mi. 2: 

. . . PETITIIONER

H %'§ax»..':z*r1§: sx~:$T1**:', ADVCEATE)

R913:

1.

cpzszszzqxwn, _ . .’
3.14:2 amazmpn FOCsJ.AR¥’,” –

5:933 Azzauwfio

KU}3.ERIi3?sLU $063.3, “” ”

‘.a.:s:nE*:*-‘:~z:ansz2a,’«.
1 _ Anvmgfig.

3ssz..’*.e’=’a:i.ta’..*.-;f,;;:rv.x1″‘e* .=,; “rm.

s_.t-mnxikgi, ‘

mu? $4 YEARS.

” ” ” 35:22′ .;s1@-.2412 “EEARY,

_32.s*’::_’:s afimam muss,
EEBMAR ‘$03? a VILLAGE,

_ P«a:’m;;a TALCEK.

‘ .3. am:.z«1:H nmmam,

*.YI’l{‘§E UNITEB INIIIB. IPEURAME CG.L’}”D.,

BRMQCH $FFICE, PREB’!’§{} BIEILDINS,

” MAIN READ, PUTTUR, fix.

H<'I£*W0'¥#|fl wwwm W5 mmmwsmaammm mww vzwmwm Ur %fi§€Wm"fiS"fl%.%& Wifiéfl QQUW' 3?: mwmmm NEQH €36

M

4. m%1 s.AcH2a3z’:’A,
war: wars szmzmmsm Amman,
3.333 was? .59 mans,
Ma $Rf%€§EET?-$3,.

H.:~::3.5-2,, wig,
?R&RKRBfi, 333?}.

5. mm EFAHCH nmmsn, :

‘ma Han’ 15:51.31 Assunmcz cc. ,1 L’rn.’,«,
333.9333 DFFICE, 2′” rneaa,
3%.’: RAM Mmnfi,
0FF.HEJ3cI3 P{3$’l” GFFICE,

UBUFI ..

V’ * L. _, . . ?.ES?OI4fi3ENTS
‘ §9ue§~a_ V ‘

‘I’hi$ 5s’zit4_?~:..tit:it3n”;%¢5_,fi;1§d’ sgntiier Articles
“226 and 2?? mi 47133 Cé:n:%ti;tutiVon”‘e_f1.V-xndia praying
ta quaaéz the’ €112».-‘iLg;:r:_!a:1’£;..: grit: ?:xt&:.:d dated 24.11.2007
mafia in 34%;: _:-£~:g:.1;-‘?fl£ré}.by: that’ Motor Accidant
Claim ‘i’;:f;;b:zi’:=.,a’1,;«:.;:__1§utj:’L2.;*; “.-“«.’!..-.,K.J.3′ vicle Annuxurewk,
etc. V *»I t ‘ *»’

T}”2i$’*_&’i*:i_.t’ P«V§tfi.3;”‘:§Li:sz:: ‘T<e.f,§:ia;:i:3g on for preliminary
haearizsg tiéxisg day,'=.t3"2a' !f:éL1_.rt mafia the fallawting:
£32323

V' ~.'?:haa_p{a€;itVimnez aasailing the correctnaas

ax" and Mara dated 24.11.2907

made in No.1/239$ by the Matt}: Accident:
zfixamal, Euttur, 9.22., Vida Anmxuraw

"lr§a'?a' 22rzaaa:a.ted the inaxtant Writ Petition.

2.. Tha grievance made eut by trim

Vyatitianer in the instant Writ Petition is

II
IF”?

I;

Eenaa, ha was canatxainad ta file the instant
Wait Eetitian. seeking the reliefa aaw stated

suyra.

3. I have haand the iééfifid £§fifia91 f§rb

the yatitisnez s:i.s.vishw$jit§ sh§::y.=hN

4. Tha lsaxngd Cc#%é%1,§o# tfi¢fip%£itioner
at tha mut$atV Qphm$t§§§Vf#§a:, the Ordax
imyugnad ia.n§t §ua§§ifi%§i§&&fi% fi§e petitioner
ha gag i£$§ #§:fi£ :%fi§&§ “f¢ invoke the
pr¢vi$§$n§I ¢§_i3§§%iéfi_:1%$§2) of tha Hotcr
?ahi%1a§A§§t,;1fi$§f gsftha impugned Order has

been §asa§dlfiifih§fi% #i%ifi§ an mpp¢rtunity to

the pe§iticna&:,i%éréfara, he submitted that,

ache a%id_§:d§t,ia liable to be vitiated.

m-….”. ,………M wwwww writ” mmmmmamrmm WWWW am,-mam WE” %&RNm”‘£”A%& Méfifi fifiififi?’ 6? mwemmm W§@W fifi

.3g° RE§#: ?caxeful perusal af the Grder

;§§ugnaq and the graunda urged by the

‘f §$fiitfi5@er what it amergea ia that, in View af

“§’t§§ £ufigmant af this Gaunt in the eaaa of THE

V'”=,§:v1s:axAL mayasaa, was NarIoNAL znsunancx

;uCQfiEAfi§ LIHITEB VS. fiflfifififl SURREY SHE? END

THERE QILR 2363 KRRHETAKA 4366), the ‘firit

w W. awuvuwwuwxu ummvawlhraho Haw” Vuvwuwwmun -1.” nmrnnumwuorm-»<&v""9.9<wW%'a. Maw" -o.-wmrmae MM awvwmwamssmmm mawm %..e~'M*"%2.aM*€.i«f W?" z\L#'«%W§'%&MfiVM§%'§% MEWW mfifim

Fatitian is nat maintainabla after the awnar

is mafia liabla ta pay tha capensationwéndflthe

aniy remady at Appaal lies fi$fiéfif ft§é_

gzaviaians Gf thm Rotor V¢hi¢le3 RCE; i§83,x:tVV'

has been claarly held tfigtg if thé éfifie; is

qaestianing the liability imfiasad fin h;$ fo:

visiatisn of the tenm§Tafid co$fiit§oé of the
inauranca paling; fhafi mnfifirffiha provisians of
Sactien 1?3§2} :9f th¢ jfi¢E¢@"f?éhiclea Act,

1933, be th;~,« fifappeaz .

6L”-_Eari£g”°;§gau%i””fo the faats and

¢ircumzt$ms%$ cf fihé ¢%a§ and in the light ef

the &fiégamafit afi_:h£§”€@urt statad supra, the

,inatan§’1§@it fiétition atands diapcsed of

iés%z%ingaii§é§fy tn the petitionax to file an

*.-ap§éa1 find§£ffifie pxaviaiona af Section 173 af

Lfl_th; Mata: Vahiclaa Afit, 1983, within a period

‘ ‘§fi t£fi*daya frmn the date of receipt of tha
‘ u¢¢§ffaf this firfiar. All the graund urged in

*,§§£a petitian are laft apen.

, \lNMml”M{4 wwwmm »..M~ wMmnVWHMm% Mmm EQUWE” £3? mmmmm wmw CQUWF fifi %9e.W’dfie’Zfi%Kfl H§G§’~5 Q

II
0’1

if the petitioner files! a name tax: return
of the certifisd coyy of the iz@ugned_.J1;1’£i§tL3ent
arm meazfi, affice is directed

a arms fcszthsaeith.

Dzfiarad accaréingjwly. ~ ‘~ VV

human; as