High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 8 January, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 8 January, 2009
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                       CHANDIGARH


                                       Crl. Misc. No.M-25899 of 2008
                                       Date of Decision : 08.01.2009

Inderjit Singh
                                                 ...Petitioner
                             Versus
State of Punjab & another
                                                 ...Respondents
                                       Crl. Misc. No.M-182 of 2009

Mohinder Kaur & others
                                                 ...Petitioners
                             Versus
State of Punjab & another
                                                 ...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA

Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate,
         for the petitioners.

          Mr. Gazi Mohd. Umair, DAG, Punjab,
          for the respondent-State.

          Mr. L.S.Savra, Advocate,
          for respondent No.2.

RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)

This order shall dispose of Crl.Misc.No.M-25899 of 2008 filed

by Inderjit Singh and Crl.Misc.No.M-182 of 2009 filed by Mohinder kaur

and others, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No.173 dated

13.8.2002, registered under Section 498-A IPC, at Police Station Hariana,

District Hoshiarpur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on

the basis of a compromise (Annexure P-1).

Counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.2 pray that, as

parties have entered into a compromise, the FIR be quashed.
Crl. Misc. No.M-25899 of 2008 -2-
Crl. Misc. No.M-182 of 2009

I have heard counsel for the parties, perused the paper book and

compromise (Annexure P-1).

The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and

acknowledges the correctness of the compromise Annexure P-1. In

addition, the complainant states that she has no objection, if the FIR is

quashed as the matrimonial dispute has come to an end by grant of a

decree of divorce. The complainant has filed an affidavit acknowledging

the correctness of the compromise and the facts referred to herein above.

The affidavit is taken on record as Ex.`A’. A relevant extract of the

affidavit reads as follows :

“2. That the compromise dated 27.9.2008 has been

arrived at between the parties and on the basis of aforesaid

compromise, the present petition has been filed before this

Hon’ble Court for quashing the FIR No.173 dated 13.8.2002

under Section 498-A IPC, P.S.Hariana, District Hoshiarpur.

3. That as per the compromise, the deponent i.e.

Respondent No.2 has received the amount of Rs.25,000/- in

cash in the Court on 8.1.2009 from the petitioner Inderjit

Singh.

4. That the deponent has no objection, if the FIR in

question and other proceedings consequent thereto are

quashed.”

Counsel for the State of Punjab submits that the State has no

objection, if the FIR is quashed as this would enable the parties to start

their lives afresh, as they have resolved their matrimonial disputes.
Crl. Misc. No.M-25899 of 2008 -3-
Crl. Misc. No.M-182 of 2009

The genesis of the FIR is a matrimonial dispute, which as

noticed herein above, has been resolved by grant of a decree of divorce

and by payment of money to the complainant. In such a situation, to

allow the prosecution to continue, would be a wastage of precious Court’s

time and an impediment in the parties leading their lives afresh leaving

behind this sordid chapter in their lives. In this view of the matter, the

prayer for quashing of the FIR, made by the petitioners and the

complainant herself is accepted.

In view of what has been stated hereinabove, particularly on

account of the compromise and the affidavit filed by the complainant, the

present petition is allowed, and the FIR No.173 dated 13.8.2002,

registered under Section 498-A IPC, at Police Station Hariana, District

Hoshiarpur, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are

quashed.

January 08, 2009                                  (RAJIVE BHALLA)
Vimal/GS                                               JUDGE