High Court Karnataka High Court

Indian Insitute Of Astrophysics vs Smt Kamakshi on 20 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Indian Insitute Of Astrophysics vs Smt Kamakshi on 20 January, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
.- ....... .......------ -- ---- ---------- »  -- ------- -v-- ---- ----vv --- -I-----u -v -M-uv-I n-an VJVMIIVIGVJI '..-lu Lelzuu I-|3||-1 V)|Vj_VNaV)| do lgfloa H9

 L *

'V V   :*::~::_ ,
" , '=.'f:£j%§Di:~"% . _  %§%:3§

' T.  E{§%g?.i%.n! $"§'R'§;E'T
  §;:a:;§r_:w§:: '*§EL§;,E£§E

' -~§fE';§,-§.,s:,.'}§-BE: - $33 4:231

pwwfi

3: THE; Zfiiéif m%:3§:* iffii? §;£§§%§;*§:%,§§§ g&_%;£2s';:{z:%g%V%%%ji%Lk 

§§.:7§'£§ mg  25% ms; {:2}? a.§£E§'i§;%fi?'§é§ 1',      "

ggyim:   

'$33 :=<::3§%*§};E $33 33 §"E"EC-E41': 

$333'? ?§::*:'r:r3§%* fag? :3§:Zi.§%P?b;*§%::%:fi*§V.€§§§&:%§':?éj"  

gamma? :

EEEEAR §?€S'TE"§"£§"§'E £3§«*  
fix$TRi:2FH*f'$E€E$§,5;..j$£:}é3§§'E"§  _ _  ' 
REfiE3'i*EREB    "  
SQSEETES TR"§3{3§E§?E:z%*I'§€:§%§§_¢§_;{.ZT§1   
mafia %Efi5§.'T:§E?'§3ff:{:iE--' " '
AT 3 EZ.£§€';i§§.g  '
aA3;fie.a;§;:§t.§4TAEa3§2 £333   .

RE? 3? ms AE:Ie§E§é§'i?4$i€?é17€I:'%:'?§f'%EE"'-. ' '
Q?"§fifi§¥ $§.3'fi&L--f.%.§
33$ La%;':*E flfi  ..
figfi Em, E 3', EW Sfifififi
fififififi fiéfifi Imam
Efiiiiiiééifififi: v sfiéfi fiéfi

 

4. $E?.1.$§3§§§$§;%'UFE3L§§ ?§§[i3§§£E.«§§a§  
am I£I"E  3' §§.::::raL£..s:;;;%; 
 Efiwffifi , % - %
Eifiz Efiyfikfifi, §;3'3""':§R{:§$3 H  ' V
fififiiifi   EQAB   '
 ft-?§§fl_§§.«§§= '

 
 

 

"   E'?.§{3Pfi?§'§E:1?'$

5.,' A - 

This v;r::?'§.?;  §:;5T"%§§;.fl5"'i.;m£§;am*' fiirtzlaks Q25 and
23"? ef 'ihagr;"£3ir;:s,::é;~s;'s3Z%;'§;;*s::i£..::s3r§."*r§i'--E:§§%$v§;1~*a§=fi% tag kaaa 3 Wfii
$1 $23 ziamfé €:31i5'7_~ mgxgagfiafliéig :fif¢r:tin,§ 331$ V gagéfii. City
Cistfi flu "tag  Em hm: the 1&3. Within
33 fiays armi m a§m:aéa}%::--£vz§:.1 1:: Q8 I§£n§*'-';~%3Ef§§ filai
$5; the ..2°a&sg§,3a':2a§;::::3?z;g--" £1": aimréaxam mi}: éaar

_ Cij zmzi.  V

 

V'    mg far 

$3fiER

 K   " = '7i'4_'}1a ';'::s.sf§§'*€,§2:31":s.a2'* E §+3§'§§:fi&,::E fiafi is': {$8 E€s3.§%€}};f' $3
 ggfiwglg czf as mag my  gafim mm airy
T  fig "mfarm  fiaufé. $%}mZ'ng ix} éfimi fim iriaé

mus": 2% éiswaa fii' Efié; 5% 31:: the wié wait at

?aI11f1€l5f§.§I'&*C .



 

éo
=r-
H
:3
0
U
I
2
I
<
E
Z
5
ii.
0
E
3
0
U
:3:
$2
I
E
z
E
I.
3
:2
3
3
J
L'
2
E
E
E

2. As the patitinnar has sought for R. 

the trial court to dfipoae of the  
applicatim, notice In respondent   u  

3. Sri.Ramd.as, luzxned .§at1i6r_ _ ::sam1p,e$. % ft %

hr the petitioner: I dafiandant’ suit
was mad in the; year for
tamparary court and
granted an the suit
the entered appearance and
film! * T nbjactirm to nu –

on 27.5.2006. But the
application is Imrtyut disposed of.

1 dnfimdart No.4 filed an

‘ Z 39 Rub 4 playing for mmsng

” of status quo. Evan then, the trial
yutdiapcsad of tin apphfi ‘ On the
theiuhu-im ordar of status quo is mag

L/l

goa§§WfzEi§\»Tfi ‘§mWs)Mt»i9’£t%…vK Maud-M