IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.1625 of 2006
INDU KUMAR PODDAR
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
3. 14.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
That the petitioner had been appointed on contract basis and
that his appointment may have been terminated prematurely, whether
under the conditions of the appointment or illegally, as the petitioner
claims, are all academic issues in view of the fact that the tenure of the
contractual appointment which is the subject matter of controversy has
itself expired on 31.3.2006 when the petitioner came to this Court in
February, 2006.
This Court is not persuaded to decide the academic issues.
The application is, therefore, disposed off with observation that if the
petitioner applies in pursuance to any fresh requisition, his application
shall be considered duly in accordance with law.
AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)