Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Inspecting vs Keshavlal on 18 March, 2011
Author: Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CRA/1033/1996	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 1033 of 1996
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

INSPECTING
OFFICER (COURT-FEES) - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

KESHAVLAL
AMRATLAL & 147 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
:
 

MS.
VAIJAYANTI PATHAK, AGP, for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR DL KOTHARI for
Opponent(s) : 1 - 28,31 - 37,39 - 41, 45,47 - 49, 96,
111, 
UNSERVED-REFUSED (R) for Opponent(s) : 29, 43, 109,119 -
127. 
DELETED for Opponent(s) : 30, 42, 65, 70, 79, 136, 
RULE
SERVED for Opponent(s) : 38, 44, 46,50 - 64, 66,68 - 69,71 - 72,
74,76 - 77,80 - 91,94 - 95,97 - 107, 110,112 - 118,128 - 135,137 -
138,140 - 146, 148, 
None for Opponent(s) : 67,
78, 
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Opponent(s) : 73, 75,92 - 93, 108,
139, 
- for Opponent(s) : 0.0.0
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 18/03/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

Learned
AGP Ms. Vaijayanti Pathak, under instructions, seeks permission to
delete the unserved respondents who have expired. She is permitted to
delete. Amendment be carried out forthwith. S.O. to 1.4.2011.

(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J)

(pkn)

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.334 seconds.