High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ishwar Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ishwar Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Criminal Miscellaneous No.14366 of 2011
                          Ishwar Kumar, S/o Late Bhola Ram.
                                         Versus
                                   The State of Bihar
                                      --------------

03. 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A and 26 of Arms Act.

The petitioner was refused bail by order dated

13.09.2010 since 27 cartridges were recovered from his

possession. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail

on the ground that he is in custody since 25.04.2010 and

only four witnesses have been examined during trial

which is confirmed by the Trial Court.

Considering the period of custody as also the

undertaking of Birendra Prasad the cousin brother of the

petitioner, let the petitioner, above named be released on

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or

any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction

of Sri P.A. Kaushik, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,

Nalanda at Biharsharif (or its successor) in connection

with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 49 of 2010 (G.R. No. 935 of

2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of

the bailors will be cousin brother of the petitioner namely
2

Birendra Prasad who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other

bailor shall be local since the petitioner belongs to

Shekhpura. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit

that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner

will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do

so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

Vikash/-                                (Anjana Prakash, J.)