High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ishwar Singh vs State Of Haryana on 27 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ishwar Singh vs State Of Haryana on 27 November, 2009
Criminal Appeal No.1003-SB of 2005                               -1-

                                ***


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
              AT CHANDIGARH

                          Criminal Appeal No.1003-SB of 2005
                          Date of decision : 27.11.2009

Ishwar Singh                                                     ....Appellant

                                       Versus

State of Haryana                                           ....Respondent

                                ****

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND

Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the appellant.

            Mr. S.S.Pattar, Senior Deputy Advocate General,Haryana

S. D. ANAND, J.

The appellant was convicted by the learned Trial Judge, for an

offence under Section 57 of the Narcotic Drgus and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985, and was sentenced to undergo RI for nine months

and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant

was directed to undergo further RI for a period of two months. The charge,

upheld at the trial, was that appellant had been found in conscious

possession of 250 grams of charas.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, at the

very outset, states that he does not contest the finding on merits but would

request for dilution on the point of sentence awarded by the learned Trial

Court in view of the fact that the appellant faced the ordeal of trial for about

two years and even present appeal has been pending since the year

2005. The fine stands already paid.

I have been through the file. The finding of conviction
Criminal Appeal No.1003-SB of 2005 -2-

***

recorded by the learned Trial Judge is relatable to the material obtaining

on the file and cannot be faulted on any valid score. Apart therefrom,

finding of conviction has not been contested on merits thereof.

In the circumstances of the case, the appeal shall stand

dismissed on merits thereof. However, in view of the fact that the

petitioner has been in custody for a period of about 4-1/2 months out of

awarded sentence of RI for a period of nine months, the sentence

awarded to the appellant shall stand reduced to the period already

undergone by the appellant.

November 27, 2009                                    (S. D. ANAND)
Pka                                                    JUDGE